Literature DB >> 12665987

Hemodynamics during active and passive recovery from a single bout of supramaximal exercise.

Antonio Crisafulli1, Valentina Orrù, Franco Melis, Filippo Tocco, Alberto Concu.   

Abstract

The aim of this work was to study the differences in cardiovascular response during two modes of recovery [active (AR): pedalling at 40 W; and passive (PR): complete rest seated] from a single bout of supramaximal exercise. Eight male amateur soccer players underwent two supramaximal cycle-ergometer tests, each consisting of pedalling against a resistance equivalent to 150% of the maximum workload achieved in a previous incremental test, followed by randomly assigned AR or PR. Cardiodynamic variables were obtained using an impedance cardiograph. Subjects were also connected to a sphygmomanometer, for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and to a metabolimeter for oxygen uptake (VO(2)) assessments. We measured: heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), the inverse of myocardial contractility calculated as pre-ejection period/left ventricular ejection time ratio (PEP/LVET), mean blood pressure (MBP), thoracic electrical impedance ( Z(0)) as an index of central blood volume, and arterio-venous oxygen difference (A-V O(2) Diff.). PR caused a lower CO compared to AR [mean (SE): 7 (0.7) vs. 10.4 (0.6) l.min(-1 )at the 5th min of recovery] due to lower HR [106.2 (3.6) vs. 121.8 (4.5) bpm at the 5th min of recovery], SV [67.1 (5) vs. 86.1 (4.8) ml at the 5th min of recovery], and PEP/VET values [0.44 (0.007) vs. 0.39 (0.015) at the 5th min of recovery]. No differences were found in MBP and Z(0) between PR and AR [95.1 (1.9) vs. 92.3 (2.7) mmHg and 26.2 (1.1) vs. 26.6 (1) Omega respectively at the 5th min of recovery], while A-V O(2) Diff. values were higher during AR than during PR [108.8 (4.3) vs. 75.2 (5.4) ml.l(-1) at the 5th min of recovery]. Thus, although after a single bout of supramaximal exercise SV and CO are lower during PR than during AR, these differences are not due to an impairment of cardiovascular function, but are fully explained by the lesser muscular engagement that leads to a reduction in stimuli deriving from mechanoreceptors and central commands, thus causing a faster return of myocardial contractility and HR to resting values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12665987     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-003-0796-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  32 in total

1.  A new impedance cardiograph device for the non-invasive evaluation of cardiac output at rest and during exercise: comparison with the "direct" Fick method.

Authors:  A Charloux; E Lonsdorfer-Wolf; R Richard; E Lampert; M Oswald-Mammosser; B Mettauer; B Geny; J Lonsdorfer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Comparison of impedance cardiography with indirect Fick (CO2) method of measuring cardiac output in healthy children during exercise.

Authors:  P Pianosi; D Garros
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Influence of light physical activity on cardiac responses during recovery from exercise in humans.

Authors:  T Takahashi; Y Miyamoto
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1998-03

4.  Applied physiology of soccer.

Authors:  B Ekblom
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Left ventricular hemodynamics during exercise recovery.

Authors:  E C Johnson; T L Hudson; E R Greene
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1990-07

6.  Dynamic asymmetries of cardiac output transients in response to muscular exercise in man.

Authors:  T Yoshida; B J Whipp
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-10-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Reliability and validity of measures of cardiac output during incremental to maximal aerobic exercise. Part II: Novel techniques and new advances.

Authors:  D E Warburton; M J Haykowsky; H A Quinney; D P Humen; K K Teo
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Endurance athletes' stroke volume does not plateau: major advantage is diastolic function.

Authors:  N Gledhill; D Cox; R Jamnik
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Stroke volume response to progressive exercise in athletes engaged in different types of training.

Authors:  A Concu; C Marcello
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1993

10.  Autonomic mechanisms of muscle metaboreflex control of heart rate.

Authors:  D S O'Leary
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1993-04
View more
  22 in total

1.  The physiological effects of low-intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on short-term recovery from supra-maximal exercise bouts in male triathletes.

Authors:  J K Malone; G F Coughlan; L Crowe; G C Gissane; B Caulfield
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Hemodynamic responses and linear and non-linear dynamics of cardiovascular autonomic regulation following supramaximal exercise.

Authors:  Styliani Goulopoulou; Bo Fernhall; Jill A Kanaley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Comparison of active and electrostimulated recovery strategies after fatiguing exercise.

Authors:  Marc Vanderthommen; Souleyma Makrof; Christophe Demoulin
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Cardiovascular adjustments in breath-hold diving: comparison between divers and non-divers in simulated dynamic apnoea.

Authors:  Filippo Tocco; Antonio Crisafulli; Franco Melis; Cristina Porru; Gianluigi Pittau; Raffaele Milia; Alberto Concu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Mean Blood Pressure Assessment during Post-Exercise: Result from Two Different Methods of Calculation.

Authors:  Gianmarco Sainas; Raffaele Milia; Girolamo Palazzolo; Gianfranco Ibba; Elisabetta Marongiu; Silvana Roberto; Virginia Pinna; Giovanna Ghiani; Filippo Tocco; Antonio Crisafulli
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 6.  Cardiovascular recovery from psychological and physiological challenge and risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality.

Authors:  Vanessa Panaite; Kristen Salomon; Alvin Jin; Jonathan Rottenberg
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.312

7.  Active and passive recovery influence responses of luteinizing hormone and testosterone to a fatiguing strength loading.

Authors:  R S Taipale; Heikki Kyröläinen; S S Gagnon; B Nindl; J Ahtiainen; K Häkkinen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Role of heart rate and stroke volume during muscle metaboreflex-induced cardiac output increase: differences between activation during and after exercise.

Authors:  Antonio Crisafulli; Francesco Piras; Michele Filippi; Carlo Piredda; Paolo Chiappori; Franco Melis; Raffaele Milia; Filippo Tocco; Alberto Concu
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 2.781

9.  Heart rate recovery does not predict endothelial function in obese women.

Authors:  Damon L Swift; Brian A Irving; David W Brock; Christopher K Davis; Eugene J Barrett; Glenn A Gaesser; Arthur Weltman
Journal:  Obe Metab       Date:  2007-09-01

10.  Hemodynamic responses to metaboreflex activation: insights from spinal cord-injured humans.

Authors:  Antonio Crisafulli; Raffaele Milia; Stefano Vitelli; Manuela Caddeo; Filippo Tocco; Franco Melis; Alberto Concu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.