Literature DB >> 8647749

Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures.

C A Miller1, K E Woodruff, B E Pfingst.   

Abstract

We examined electrophysiological and psychophysical measures of the electrically stimulated auditory system of guinea pigs implanted with chronic intracochlear electrodes. Guinea pigs were trained to detect low-level acoustic stimuli and then unilaterally deafened and implanted with one extracochlear and two intracochlear electrodes. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) and psychophysical detection thresholds were obtained from the same animals using pulsatile stimuli. Supplementary EABR data were obtained from additional, untrained, animals. Thresholds were obtained as a function of stimulus phase duration and monopolar and longitudinal-bipolar electrode configurations. The slopes of the EABR and psychophysical functions for bipolar stimulation, averaged across subjects within 1 month after implantation, were -5.25 and -6.18 dB per doubling of pulse duration, respectively. These slopes were obtained with pulse durations ranging from 20 to 400 microseconds/phase; slope was reduced at longer pulse durations. Strength-duration slope also varied as a function of electrode configuration: monopolar stimulation produced steeper functions than did bipolar stimulation. Differences between EABR and psychophysical strength-duration measures suggest the existence of central mechanisms of stimulus integration in addition to that occurring at the level of the auditory nerve. Differences observed with variation of stimulus parameters (e.g., monopolar vs. bipolar stimulation modes) suggest that the specific mode of intracochlear electrical stimulation can influence stimulus integration. Such observations may be useful in the design of prosthetic devices and furthering our understanding of electrical excitation of the auditory system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8647749     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00204-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  17 in total

1.  Electromotile hearing: acoustic tones mask psychophysical response to high-frequency electrical stimulation of intact guinea pig cochleae.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Kohei Kawamoto; Yehoash Raphael; David F Dolan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of deafening and cochlear implantation procedures on postimplantation psychophysical electrical detection thresholds.

Authors:  Gina L Su; Deborah J Colesa; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Auditory-nerve responses to varied inter-phase gap and phase duration of the electric pulse stimulus as predictors for neuronal degeneration.

Authors:  Dyan Ramekers; Huib Versnel; Stefan B Strahl; Emma M Smeets; Sjaak F L Klis; Wilko Grolman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-28

4.  Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival.

Authors:  Pavel Prado-Guitierrez; Leonie M Fewster; John M Heasman; Colette M McKay; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The use of a dual PEDOT and RGD-functionalized alginate hydrogel coating to provide sustained drug delivery and improved cochlear implant function.

Authors:  Jennifer A Chikar; Jeffrey L Hendricks; Sarah M Richardson-Burns; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst; David C Martin
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Behavioral determination of stimulus pair discrimination of auditory acoustic and electrical stimuli using a classical conditioning and heart-rate approach.

Authors:  Simeon J Morgan; Antonio G Paolini
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  An improved cochlear implant electrode array for use in experimental studies.

Authors:  Robert Shepherd; Kristien Verhoeven; Jin Xu; Frank Risi; James Fallon; Andrew Wise
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Over-expression of BDNF by adenovirus with concurrent electrical stimulation improves cochlear implant thresholds and survival of auditory neurons.

Authors:  Jennifer A Chikar; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Adriana Di Polo; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Visualization of spiral ganglion neurites within the scala tympani with a cochlear implant in situ.

Authors:  Jennifer A Chikar; Shelley A Batts; Bryan E Pfingst; Yehoash Raphael
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Neurotrophins and electrical stimulation for protection and repair of spiral ganglion neurons following sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Anne Coco; Stephanie B Epp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.