Literature DB >> 8647732

Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. II. Changes in electrophysiological and psychophysical measures over time.

C A Miller1, M J Faulkner, B E Pfingst.   

Abstract

This study, the second of a two-part investigation, assessed changes over time in functional measures of the electrically stimulated auditory system following ototoxic deafening. Guinea pigs were trained to respond behaviorally to threshold level acoustic stimuli and then unilaterally deafened and implanted with a bipolar pair of electrodes within the cochlea and a single extracochlear electrode. Using pulsatile stimuli, thresholds for the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) and psychophysical detection were repeatedly collected from the same animals over 3-month post-implantation periods. Thresholds were obtained as a function of stimulus phase duration primarily using bipolar intracochlear stimulation. As in earlier studies, the threshold measures exhibited both intra- and intersubject variability. Analysis of group data failed to show any statistically significant changes over time in either EABR or psychophysical threshold at any fixed pulse duration. However, significant changes over time were found in the slopes of the strength-duration functions for both measures. Slopes became shallower with time, suggesting a reduction in the efficiency of stimulus current integration, a trend presumed to occur with neural degeneration. This result suggests that strength-duration functions could be useful as a clinical diagnostic measure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8647732     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00205-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  7 in total

1.  Electromotile hearing: acoustic tones mask psychophysical response to high-frequency electrical stimulation of intact guinea pig cochleae.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Kohei Kawamoto; Yehoash Raphael; David F Dolan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sensitivity to pulse phase duration in cochlear implant listeners: effects of stimulation mode.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival.

Authors:  Pavel Prado-Guitierrez; Leonie M Fewster; John M Heasman; Colette M McKay; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Use of the guinea pig in studies on the development and prevention of acquired sensorineural hearing loss, with an emphasis on noise.

Authors:  Gaëlle Naert; Marie-Pierre Pasdelou; Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.482

6.  Higher sensitivity of human auditory nerve fibers to positive electrical currents.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Robert P Carlyon; Astrid van Wieringen; John M Deeks; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-02-21

7.  Ramped pulse shapes are more efficient for cochlear implant stimulation in an animal model.

Authors:  Charlotte Amalie Navntoft; Jeremy Marozeau; Tania Rinaldi Barkat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.