Literature DB >> 8632933

Informing subjects of epidemiologic study results. Children's Cancer Group.

G R Bunin1, A E Kazak, O Mitelman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and process of providing feedback to parents regarding the results of epidemiologic research, in particular to look at the importance and clarity of the information provided, parental reactions to the results, and utilization of the data provided.
METHODOLOGY: Parents who participated in an epidemiologic study of pediatric brain tumors (patient and control mothers) were sent a letter summarizing the results of the study and the Parent Study Results Survey to complete and return. The final sample used for analyses was 109 (patient) and 90 (control) mothers. Analyses were conducted to determine differences between patient and control mothers and differences among subsets defined by educational level and vital status of the patient.
RESULTS: Mothers rated the importance and clarity of the information very highly, although patient mothers were more likely than control mothers to want more information and a telephone contact. Patient and control mothers were similar in reported sadness, anxiety, and being overwhelmed, but patient mothers felt less satisfied and relieved. Patient mothers expressed feeling more guilt nad anger than control mothers, although even the levels among the patient mothers were only moderate. Close to half of all mothers commented on the inconclusiveness of the study results. Nearly all mothers indicated they would suggest that other parents participate in epidemiologic research.
CONCLUSIONS: It is valuable to many parents that they receive information about results of research in which they have participated. We found little evidence of strong negative effects to a detailed feedback letter. We recommend that evaluative data be used to guide the process of informing research participants about study results and that investigators consider making feedback letters a standard part of research protocols.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8632933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  20 in total

1.  Informing research participants of research results: analysis of Canadian university based research ethics board policies.

Authors:  S D Macneil; C V Fernandez
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Reactions of participants to the results of a randomised controlled trial: exploratory study.

Authors:  C Snowdon; J Garcia; D Elbourne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-04

3.  Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.

Authors:  Ebony B Bookman; Aleisha A Langehorne; John H Eckfeldt; Kathleen C Glass; Gail P Jarvik; Michael Klag; Greg Koski; Arno Motulsky; Benjamin Wilfond; Teri A Manolio; Richard R Fabsitz; Russell V Luepker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting: the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research Results.

Authors:  Courtney Berrios; Cynthia A James; Karen Raraigh; Juli Bollinger; Brittney Murray; Crystal Tichnell; Carolyn D Applegate; Amanda L Bergner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Researcher practices on returning genetic research results.

Authors:  Christopher Heaney; Genevieve Tindall; Joe Lucas; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2010-10-12

6.  Research Participants' Attitudes towards Receiving Information on Genetic Susceptibility to Arsenic Toxicity in Rural Bangladesh.

Authors:  Lizeth I Tamayo; Hannah Lin; Alauddin Ahmed; Hasan Shahriar; Rabiul Hasan; Golam Sarwar; Hem Mahbubul Eunus; Habibul Ahsan; Brandon L Pierce
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Communicating the results of research: how do participants of a cardiac rehabilitation RCT prefer to be informed?

Authors:  Hasnain Dalal; Jennifer Wingham; Colin Pritchard; Sharon Northey; Philip Evans; Rod S Taylor; John Campbell
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Reporting individual test results of environmental chemicals in breastmilk: potential for premature weaning.

Authors:  Sheela R Geraghty; Jane C Khoury; Ardythe L Morrow; Bruce P Lanphear
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Recommendations for the return of research results to study participants and guardians: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Kathleen Ruccione; Robert J Wells; Jay B Long; Wendy Pelletier; Mary C Hooke; Rebecca D Pentz; Robert B Noll; Justin N Baker; Maura O'Leary; Gregory Reaman; Peter C Adamson; Steven Joffe
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Disclosure of research results to research participants: A pilot study of the needs and attitudes of adolescents and parents.

Authors:  Conrad Vincent Fernandez; Shaureen Taweel; Eric D Kodish; Charles Weijer
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.