Literature DB >> 8628837

Complications after mandibular third molar extraction.

M P de Boer1, G M Raghoebar, B Stegenga, P J Schoen, G Boering.   

Abstract

The records of 1,797 patients were retrospectively examined to analyze the possible relationships between postoperative complications following mandibular third molar extraction and parameters such as age, sex, indication for surgery, position of the molar, surgical experience, surgical technique, and postoperative care. Older patients tended to suffer more often from complications. Surgery performed while there were signs of pericoronal inflammation also resulted in more complications. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean complication rate arising from surgery performed by staff members and the rate when surgery was performed by residents. There seems to be no reason for patients to return routinely for removal of resorbable sutures or other postoperative care because this practice does not result in a decrease in postoperative symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8628837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quintessence Int        ISSN: 0033-6572            Impact factor:   1.677


  14 in total

1.  Effect of age, sex and level of surgical difficulty on inflammatory complications after third molar surgery.

Authors:  Otasowie D Osunde; Birch D Saheeb
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-10-01

2.  Evaluation of the impact of preoperative use of dexamethasone and cyclobenzaprine in surgical extraction of lower third molars on trismus by electromyographic analysis.

Authors:  Fernando Vagner Raldi; Rodrigo Dias Nascimento; Fábio Ricardo Loureiro Sato; Lucio Murillo Santos; José Benedito Oliveira Amorim; Michelle Bianchi de Moraes
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-05-22

3.  Comparing the Efficiencies of Third Molar Surgeries With and Without a Dentist Anesthesiologist.

Authors:  Uday Reebye; S Young; E Boukas; E Davidian; J Carnahan
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2017

4.  An audit of general dental practitioners' referral practice following the distribution of third molar guidelines.

Authors:  S F Worrall
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  A prospective study of clinical outcomes related to third molar removal or retention.

Authors:  Greg J Huang; Joana Cunha-Cruz; Marilynn Rothen; Charles Spiekerman; Mark Drangsholt; Loren Anderson; Gayle A Roset
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Recommendations for third molar removal: a practice-based cohort study.

Authors:  Joana Cunha-Cruz; Marilynn Rothen; Charles Spiekerman; Mark Drangsholt; Lyle McClellan; Greg J Huang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Maria Eugenia Guerrero; Raul Botetano; Jorge Beltran; Keith Horner; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  In vitro antibacterial efficacy of Vicryl Plus suture (coated Polyglactin 910 with triclosan) using zone of inibition assays.

Authors:  G Marzo; R Loffredi; E Marchetti; S DI Martino; C DI Pietro; G Marinelli
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2008-06-16

9.  Evaluation of masseter muscle electromyography after surgical extraction of third molar.

Authors:  Chan-Woo Kim; Seong-Gon Kim; Sung-Wook Park; Young-Joon Chee
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-02-13

10.  Do anatomical variations of the mandibular canal pose an increased risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury after third molar removal?

Authors:  Myrthel Vranckx; Hannah Geerinckx; Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Andre Ferreira Leite; Constantinus Politis; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.