Joana Cunha-Cruz1, Marilynn Rothen, Charles Spiekerman, Mark Drangsholt, Lyle McClellan, Greg J Huang. 1. Joana Cunha-Cruz and Charles Spiekerman are with the Department of Oral Health Sciences, Marilynn Rothen is with the Regional Clinical Dental Research Center, Mark Drangsholt is with the Department of Oral Medicine, and Greg J. Huang is with the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle. Lyle McClellan is with the Willamette Dental Group, Spokane, WA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We investigated general dentists' reasons for recommending removal or retention of third molars and whether patients adhered to dentists' recommendations. METHODS: In a 2-year prospective cohort study (2009-2011) in the Pacific Northwest, we followed 801 patients aged 16 to 22 years from 50 general dental practices. Generalized estimating equations logistic regressions related patient and dentist characteristics to dentists' recommendations to remove third molars and to patient adherence. RESULTS: General dentists recommended removal of 1683 third molars from 469 (59%) participants, mainly to prevent future problems (79%) or because a third molar had an unfavorable orientation or was unlikely to erupt (57%). Dentists recommended retention and monitoring of 1244 third molars from 366 (46%) participants, because it was too early to decide (73%), eruption path was favorable (39%), or space for eruption was sufficient (26%). When dentists recommended removal, 55% of participants adhered to this recommendation during follow-up, and the main reason was availability of insurance (88%). CONCLUSIONS: General dentists frequently recommended removal of third molars for reasons not related to symptoms or pathology, but rather to prevent future problems.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated general dentists' reasons for recommending removal or retention of third molars and whether patients adhered to dentists' recommendations. METHODS: In a 2-year prospective cohort study (2009-2011) in the Pacific Northwest, we followed 801 patients aged 16 to 22 years from 50 general dental practices. Generalized estimating equations logistic regressions related patient and dentist characteristics to dentists' recommendations to remove third molars and to patient adherence. RESULTS: General dentists recommended removal of 1683 third molars from 469 (59%) participants, mainly to prevent future problems (79%) or because a third molar had an unfavorable orientation or was unlikely to erupt (57%). Dentists recommended retention and monitoring of 1244 third molars from 366 (46%) participants, because it was too early to decide (73%), eruption path was favorable (39%), or space for eruption was sufficient (26%). When dentists recommended removal, 55% of participants adhered to this recommendation during follow-up, and the main reason was availability of insurance (88%). CONCLUSIONS: General dentists frequently recommended removal of third molars for reasons not related to symptoms or pathology, but rather to prevent future problems.
Authors: Wil J M van der Sanden; Dirk G Mettes; Alphons J M Plasschaert; Richard P T M Grol; Jan Mulder; Emiel H Verdonschot Journal: Eur J Oral Sci Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 2.612
Authors: Hossein Ghaeminia; Marloes El Nienhuijs; Verena Toedtling; John Perry; Marcia Tummers; Theo Jm Hoppenreijs; Wil Jm Van der Sanden; Theodorus G Mettes Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-05-04
Authors: Greg J Huang; Joana Cunha-Cruz; Marilynn Rothen; Charles Spiekerman; Mark Drangsholt; Loren Anderson; Gayle A Roset Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Muhtada Ahmad; Zafar Ali Khan; Tahir Ullah Khan; Montaser N Alqutub; Sameer A Mokeem; Abdulrahman M AlMubarak; Mehmood Haider; Mansour Al-Askar; Naseer Ahmed; Nada Aldahiyan; Fahim Vohra; Tariq Abduljabbar Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 3.390