Literature DB >> 24535133

Evaluation of masseter muscle electromyography after surgical extraction of third molar.

Chan-Woo Kim1, Seong-Gon Kim, Sung-Wook Park, Young-Joon Chee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the results of electromyographies (EMGs) of the masseter muscle after mandibular third molar surgery and to determine the relationships between clinical variables and EMG results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy patients were included in the study. The parameters of the patients' masseter muscles were measured using EMG prior to operation and 7 and 21 days post-operation. Clinical variables were also recorded before and after the third molar surgeries.
RESULTS: When the masseter muscle EMG results from the tooth-extracted side were compared with those from the non-extracted (control) side, significant differences in the areas of voltage, power spectral densities and median frequencies (p = 0.011, 0.017 and 0.041, respectively) were found 7 days postoperatively. Additionally, there were significant associations between some clinical variables (i.e. postoperative swelling, bone reduction and pericoronitis) and the EMG results 7 days postoperatively, (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences 21 days postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the postoperative changes in EMG activities were transient. Although there have been controversies about the reliability of EMG, this study showed that some EMG variables could be used to evaluate postoperative changes in masseter muscle activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24535133     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-014-0442-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  29 in total

1.  Mandibular fracture after third molar removal.

Authors:  M Krimmel; S Reinert
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Types, frequencies, and risk factors for complications after third molar extraction.

Authors:  Chi H Bui; Edward B Seldin; Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Electromyography in the biomechanical analysis of human movement and its clinical application.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Reproducibility of surface EMG variables in isometric sub-maximal contractions of jaw elevator muscles.

Authors:  T Castroflorio; K Icardi; B Becchino; E Merlo; C Debernardi; P Bracco; D Farina
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 2.368

5.  Changes in jaw muscle EMG activity and pain after third molar surgery.

Authors:  M Ernberg; J H Schopka; N Fougeront; P Svensson
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.837

6.  Effect of tonic muscle pain on short-latency jaw-stretch reflexes in humans.

Authors:  Kelun Wang; Peter Svensson; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Experimental muscle pain decreases voluntary EMG activity but does not affect the muscle potential evoked by transcutaneous electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Thomas Graven-Nielsen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Reproducibility of surface EMG in the human masseter and anterior temporalis muscle areas.

Authors:  Tommaso Castroflorio; Katia Icardi; Ferruccio Torsello; Andrea Deregibus; Cesare Debernardi; Pietro Bracco
Journal:  Cranio       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.020

9.  Randomized, controlled, cross-over clinical trial comparing intravenous midazolam sedation with nitrous oxide sedation in children undergoing dental extractions.

Authors:  K E Wilson; N M Girdler; R R Welbury
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Techniques of EMG signal analysis: detection, processing, classification and applications.

Authors:  M B I Raez; M S Hussain; F Mohd-Yasin
Journal:  Biol Proced Online       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 3.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.