Literature DB >> 11212455

An audit of general dental practitioners' referral practice following the distribution of third molar guidelines.

S F Worrall1.   

Abstract

Oral and maxillofacial surgery waiting lists are amongst the longest of any surgical specialty. The majority of patients on these waiting lists have been referred for removal of their third molars (wisdom teeth). With increasing pressure to reduce the size of both out-patient and surgical waiting lists, it is important to ensure that only those patients with a recognised clinical need are referred and accepted for treatment. In April 1998, local general dental practitioners were issued guidelines for the management of patients with impacted third molars. This paper describes an audit that assessed the impact of this intervention. The results suggest that referral guidelines are an effective means of changing general dental practitioners' referral practice and that, used along with other strategies, could be effective in reducing oral and maxillofacial surgery out-patient and surgical waiting lists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11212455      PMCID: PMC2503547     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  17 in total

1.  Lingual access for third molar surgery: a 20-year retrospective audit.

Authors:  C E Moss; M J Wake
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.651

Review 2.  Implementing guidelines in general practice care.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-09

3.  Complications after mandibular third molar extraction.

Authors:  M P de Boer; G M Raghoebar; B Stegenga; P J Schoen; G Boering
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.677

Review 4.  Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians.

Authors:  J Lomas; G M Anderson; K Domnick-Pierre; E Vayda; M W Enkin; W J Hannah
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Clinical guidelines: their implementation in general practice.

Authors:  M Conroy; W Shannon
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Surgical removal of third molars.

Authors:  J P Shepherd; M Brickley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-10

7.  Assessment of inferior alveolar and lingual nerve disturbances after dentoalveolar surgery, and of recovery of sensitivity.

Authors:  S Schultze-Mosgau; R H Reich
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Comparison of clinical treatment decisions with US National Institutes of Health consensus indications for lower third molar removal.

Authors:  M Brickley; J Shepherd; G Mancini
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1993-08-07       Impact factor: 1.626

9.  Permanent damage to inferior alveolar and lingual nerves during the removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Comparison of two methods of bone removal.

Authors:  J P Rood
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1992-02-08       Impact factor: 1.626

10.  Sense about wisdoms?

Authors:  P Bramley
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  3 in total

1.  The efficiency and quality of the care pathway for adult patients being referred to the East Lancashire and Blackburn with Darwen Oral Surgery Services.

Authors:  G Chiu; M Catleugh
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Prevalence of cysts and tumors around the retained and unerupted third molars in the Indian population.

Authors:  Santosh Patil; Vishal Halgatti; Suneet Khandelwal; B S Santosh; Sneha Maheshwari
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2014-08-12

3.  Quality of oral surgery referrals and how to improve them.

Authors:  Mikael Björkeborn; Henrik Nilsson; Jonas Anderud
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2017-11-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.