Literature DB >> 8627416

Recovery kinetics of human rod phototransduction inferred from the two-branched alpha-wave saturation function.

D R Pepperberg1, D G Birch, K P Hofmann, D C Hood.   

Abstract

Electroretinographic data obtained from human subjects show that bright test flashes of increasing intensity induce progressively longer periods of apparent saturation of the rod-mediated electroretinogram (ERG) alpha wave. A prominent feature of the saturation function [the function that relates the saturation period T with the natural logarithm of flash intensity (ln I(f)] is its two-branched character. At relatively low flash intensities (I(f) below approximately 4 x 10(4) scotopic troland second), T increases approximately in proportion to ln I(f) with a slope [delta T/delta (ln I(f)] of approximately 0.3 s. At higher flash intensities, a different linear relation prevails, in which [deltaT/delta(ln I(f) is approximately 2.3 s [Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 36, 1603 (1995)]. Based on a model for photocurrent recovery in isolated single rods [Vis. Neurosci. 8, 9 (1992)], it was suggested that the upper-branch slope of approximately 2.3 s represents tau R*, the lifetime of photoactivated rhodopsin (R*). Here we show that a modified version of this model provides an explanation for the lower branch of the alpha-wave saturation function. In this model, tau E* is the exponential lifetime of an activated species (E*) within the transducin or guanosine 3', 5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) phosphodiesterase stages of rod phototransduction; the generation of E* by a single R* occurs within temporally defined, elemental domains of disk membrane; and Ex, the immediate product of E* deactivation, is converted only slowly (time constant tau Ex) to E, the form susceptible to reactivation by R*. The model predicts that the decay of flash-activated cGMP phosphodiesterase (PDE*) is largely independent of the deactivation kinetics of R* at early postflash times (i.e., at times preceding or comparable with the lifetime tau E*) and that the lower-branch slope (approximately 0.3s) of the a-wave saturation function represent tau E*. The predicted early-stage independence of PDE* decay and R* deactivation furthermore suggests a basis for the relative constancy of the single-photon response observed in studies of isolated rods. Numerical evaluation of the model yields a value of approximately 6.7s for the time constant tau Ex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8627416     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.13.000586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  20 in total

1.  Analysis of Ca++-dependent gain changes in PDE activation in vertebrate rod phototransduction.

Authors:  R D Hamer
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2000-12-31       Impact factor: 2.367

2.  Electroretinographic determination of human rod flash response in vivo.

Authors:  D R Pepperberg; D G Birch; D C Hood
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  Time course of the flash response of dark- and light-adapted human rod photoreceptors derived from the electroretinogram.

Authors:  C Friedburg; M M Thomas; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Dynamic and steady-state light adaptation of mouse rod photoreceptors in vivo.

Authors:  G A Silva; J R Hetling; D R Pepperberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Excitation and desensitization of mouse rod photoreceptors in vivo following bright adapting light.

Authors:  Jennifer J Kang Derwent; Nasser M Qtaishat; David R Pepperberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The role of steady phosphodiesterase activity in the kinetics and sensitivity of the light-adapted salamander rod photoresponse.

Authors:  S Nikonov; T D Lamb; E N Pugh
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 7.  The neurovascular retina in retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Anne B Fulton; Ronald M Hansen; Anne Moskowitz; James D Akula
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 21.198

8.  Differential changes in retina function with normal aging in humans.

Authors:  Paul R Freund; Juliane Watson; Gregory S Gilmour; Frédéric Gaillard; Yves Sauvé
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  A model for the recovery kinetics of rod phototransduction, based on the enzymatic deactivation of rhodopsin.

Authors:  U Laitko; K P Hofmann
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Stochastic simulation of the transducin GTPase cycle.

Authors:  S Felber; H P Breuer; F Petruccione; J Honerkamp; K P Hofmann
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.