Literature DB >> 8626954

Dobutamine-induced wall motion abnormalities: correlations with myocardial fractional flow reserve and quantitative coronary angiography.

J Bartunek1, T H Marwick, A C Rodrigues, M Vincent, E Van Schuerbeeck, S U Sys, B de Bruyne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated both the relation between dobutamine-induced wall motion abnormalities and the physiologic and morphologic features of epicardial coronary artery stenoses and the impact of the extent of the area at risk on the sensitivity of dobutamine echocardiography.
BACKGROUND: The accuracy of dobutamine echocardiography has traditionally been assessed by comparing results with stenosis geometry. Myocardial fractional flow reserve is a functional index of coronary stenosis severity that takes into account both antero-grade and collateral flow and may therefore be a more appropriate standard for comparison.
METHODS: Seventy-five patients with normal left ventricular function, good echocardiographic images and an isolated coronary stenosis underwent, within 6 h, dobutamine echocardiography, quantitative coronary angiography and intracoronary pressure measurements. Myocardial fractional flow reserve was calculated as the ratio of mean hyperemic distal coronary to aortic pressure.
RESULTS: The degree of dobutamine-induced dyssynergy correlated significantly with percent diameter stenosis (r = 0.68), area stenosis (r = 0.68) and minimal lumen diameter (r = -0.60) and markedly better with myocardial fractional flow reserve (r = -0.77). However, marked dispersion of the individual data was observed. The sensitivity of dobutamine echocardiography in detecting lesions with a minimal lumen diameter < or = 1 mm and diameter stenosis > or = 50% was 83% and 80%, respectively. All but one patient with a myocardial fractional flow reserve >0.75 had a normal stress test result. Among patients with a myocardial fractional flow reserve < or = 0.75, the sensitivity of dobutamine echocardiography was significantly lower for lesions in vessels with a reference diameter < or = 2.6 mm than for lesions in larger vessels (58% vs. 90%, p = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: 1) The magnitude of wall motion abnormalities induced by dobutamine infusion correlates with angiographic and, more closely, with functional indexes of stenosis severity, even though a wide scatter is observed. 2) In patients with a functionally significant stenosis, the amount of myocardium at risk is a critical determinant of the accuracy of dobutamine echocardiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8626954     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00022-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  13 in total

Review 1.  Coronary pressure measurement and fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  N H Pijls; B De Bruyne
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  PET measurement of adenosine stimulated absolute myocardial blood flow for physiological assessment of the coronary circulation.

Authors:  Henry Gewirtz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Stress echocardiography for the detection and assessment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Nowell M Fine; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Negative stress echocardiographic responses in normotensive and hypertensive patients with angina pectoris, positive exercise stress testing, and normal coronary arteriograms.

Authors:  E G Zouridakis; I D Cox; X Garcia-Moll; S Brown; P Nihoyannopoulos; J C Kaski
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Non-contrast second harmonic imaging improves interobserver agreement and accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with impaired image quality.

Authors:  A Franke; R Hoffmann; H P Kühl; W Lepper; O A Breithardt; M Schormann; P Hanrath
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  [Methods for coronary functional assessment].

Authors:  M Elsner
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.443

7.  Fractional Flow Reserve: Does a Cut-off Value add Value?

Authors:  Shah R Mohdnazri; Thomas R Keeble; Andrew Sp Sharp
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2016-05

8.  Feasibility, safety and accuracy of regadenoson-atropine (REGAT) stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an angiographic correlative study.

Authors:  Kamran Shaikh; Dee Dee Wang; Hani Saad; Mohsin Alam; Akshay Khandelwal; Kristen Brooks; Hari Iyer; Phuc Nguyen; Stephanie Boedeker; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Fractional flow reserve as a surrogate for inducible myocardial ischaemia.

Authors:  Tim P van de Hoef; Martijn Meuwissen; Javier Escaned; Justin E Davies; Maria Siebes; Jos A E Spaan; Jan J Piek
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 10.  Coronary pressure-derived fractional flow reserve in the assessment of coronary artery stenoses.

Authors:  Nikolaos Kakouros; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Julie M Miller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.