Literature DB >> 9592704

[Methods for coronary functional assessment].

M Elsner1.   

Abstract

Functional evaluation of coronary vasomotion encompasses the assessment of dynamic changes in coronary lumen, vessel wall, blood flow, intracoronary pressure and myocardial perfusion in response to specific pharmacologic stimuli. These parameters are obtained to characterize mechanisms of physiologic regulation and to evaluate pathophysiologic processes and potential therapeutic strategies, especially with regard to the development of coronary atherosclerosis. To this end, a variety of direct (invasive) and indirect (non-invasive) diagnostic tools are employed. Among the invasive methods are registration of intracoronary Doppler flow, coronary pressure measurements, quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. The non-invasive modalities consist of coronary Doppler echocardiography, positron emission tomography, myocardial scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging. Because of the different technical and physiological principles involved, these methods are complementary by providing independent access to different aspects. The combined invasive functional testing as employed in the cardiac catheterization laboratory allows for a simultaneous synopsis of high-resolution coronary imaging and direct measurement of physiologic parameters during local application of defined pharmacologically active substances. However, the demands in terms of equipment, time and operator skills are high and limit this combined invasive approach to specialized centers. Besides these research purposes, a number of functional methods has entered the clinical arena. They are employed to evaluate the hemodynamic significance of coronary lesions and to assess functional outcome of therapeutic interventions in the catheterization laboratory. The underlying principles and applications of the different methods are described and an overview of selected results is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9592704     DOI: 10.1007/BF03044539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herz        ISSN: 0340-9937            Impact factor:   1.443


  135 in total

Review 1.  [New developments in parameter-oriented roentgen densitometry perfusion analysis within the scope of heart catheter studies].

Authors:  M Haude; G Caspari; D Baumgart; P Spiller; G Heusch; R Erbel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Variability of a three-layered appearance in intravascular ultrasound coronary images: a comparison of morphometric measurements with four intravascular ultrasound systems.

Authors:  T Hiro; C Y Leung; R J Russo; H Karimi; A R Farvid; J M Tobis
Journal:  Am J Card Imaging       Date:  1996-10

Review 3.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J Crnac; M C Schmidt; P Theissen; U Sechtem
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 4.  Dipyridamole stress echocardiography: state of the art 1996. EPIC (Echo Persantin International Cooperative) Study Group.

Authors:  E Picano; M Ostojic; R Sicari; M Baroni; L Cortigiani; A Pingitore
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Assessment of blood flow distal to coronary artery stenoses. Correlations between myocardial positron emission tomography and poststenotic intracoronary Doppler flow reserve.

Authors:  D D Miller; T J Donohue; T L Wolford; M J Kern; S R Bergmann
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Assessment of coronary reserve by transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography. Direct comparison between different modalities of dipyridamole and adenosine administration.

Authors:  M Kozàkovà; C Palombo; L Pratali; G Bigalli; M Marzilli; A Distante; A L'Abbate
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Effect of aging on myocardial perfusion reserve.

Authors:  N G Uren; P G Camici; J A Melin; A Bol; B de Bruyne; J Radvan; I Olivotto; S D Rosen; M Impallomeni; W Wijns
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Value and limitations of intracoronary adenosine for the assessment of coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  F Zijlstra; Y Juillière; P W Serruys; J R Roelandt
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1988

Review 9.  Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET.

Authors:  M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Coronary flow reserve assessment by dobutamine transesophageal Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  M F Stoddard; C R Prince; G T Morris
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Endothelial dysfunction in patients with acute coronary syndrome].

Authors:  S Fichtlscherer; A M Zeiher
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.740

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.