Literature DB >> 24463854

Feasibility, safety and accuracy of regadenoson-atropine (REGAT) stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an angiographic correlative study.

Kamran Shaikh1, Dee Dee Wang, Hani Saad, Mohsin Alam, Akshay Khandelwal, Kristen Brooks, Hari Iyer, Phuc Nguyen, Stephanie Boedeker, Karthik Ananthasubramaniam.   

Abstract

Regadenoson (REG), a selective A2A receptor vasodilator, has not been widely evaluated in stress echocardiography (SE). We report results of 45 patients participating in REG + atropine (REGAT) SE protocol conducted in a single-center prospective trial. The REGAT study enrolled subjects before a clinically indicated cardiac catheterization for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). After rest imaging, a 2 mg Atropine (AT) bolus followed by 400 mcg of REG was given. Standard stress imaging views were obtained and interpreted in blinded fashion. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated using cardiac catheterization >70 % stenosis as gold standard. Additional endpoints included major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and patient questionnaire responses. The mean duration of REGAT was 18 ± 7.2 min. There were no MACE, with only transient side-effects of dry mouth, shortness of breath, and headache. The incidence of significant CAD was 51.1 %. The sensitivity and specificity for significant stenosis was 60.9 and 86.4 %, with a PPV and NPV of 82.4 and 67.9 %. By coronary territories, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were: left anterior descending artery 58.8, 92.9, 83.3, and 78.8 %; left circumflex artery 6.7, 93.3, 33.3, and 67.7 %; and right coronary artery 16.7, 93.9, 50, and 75.6 %. Over 90 % of subjects reported feeling comfortable, with 83 % preferring REGAT as a future stress modality. The REGAT protocol is fast, safe, and well-tolerated with good specificity for CAD detection, but its low sensitivity and NPV precludes it from being an imaging modality for routine use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24463854     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0363-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  33 in total

1.  Regadenoson pharmacokinetics and tolerability in subjects with impaired renal function.

Authors:  Toufigh Gordi; Brent Blackburn; Hsiao Lieu
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.126

2.  Pharmacologic stress testing for coronary disease diagnosis: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  C Kim; Y S Kwok; P Heagerty; R Redberg
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Prognostic value of pharmacological stress echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a prospective, large-scale, multicenter, head-to-head comparison between dipyridamole and dobutamine test. Echo-Persantine International Cooperative (EPIC) and Echo-Dobutamine International Cooperative (EDIC) Study Groups.

Authors:  A Pingitore; E Picano; A Varga; G Gigli; L Cortigiani; M Previtali; G Minardi; M Q Colosso; J Lowenstein; W Mathias; P Landi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Coronary flow velocity changes after intravenous dipyridamole infusion: measurements using intravascular Doppler guide wire. A documentation of flow inhomogeneity.

Authors:  V Voudris; A Manginas; V Vassilikos; M Koutelou; J Kantzis; D V Cokkinos
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Comparison of adenosine echocardiography, with and without isometric handgrip, to exercise echocardiography in the detection of ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  C B Tawa; W B Baker; N S Kleiman; A Trakhtenbroit; R Desir; W A Zoghbi
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Detection of patients with restenosis after PTCA by dipyridamole-atropine-stress-echocardiography.

Authors:  A W Scherhag; S Pfleger; A B Schreckenberger; J Grüttner; W Voelker; U Staedt; D L Heene
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-04

7.  Effects of age, gender, obesity, and diabetes on the efficacy and safety of the selective A2A agonist regadenoson versus adenosine in myocardial perfusion imaging integrated ADVANCE-MPI trial results.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Patricia Nguyen; Peter Staehr; S Richard Underwood; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-05

8.  Enhanced sensitivity for detection of coronary artery disease by addition of atropine to dipyridamole echocardiography.

Authors:  E Picano; A Pingitore; U Conti; M Kozàkovà; A Boem; E Cabani; M Ciuti; A Distante; A L'Abbate
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Selection of the optimal nonexercise stress for the evaluation of ischemic regional myocardial dysfunction and malperfusion. Comparison of dobutamine and adenosine using echocardiography and 99mTc-MIBI single photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  T Marwick; B Willemart; A M D'Hondt; T Baudhuin; W Wijns; J M Detry; J Melin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Significance of myocardial ischemic electrocardiographic changes during dipyridamole stress echocardiography.

Authors:  L Cortigiani; M Lombardi; C Michelassi; E A Paolini; E Nannini
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Infarct characterization using CT.

Authors:  Ludovico La Grutta; Patrizia Toia; Erica Maffei; Filippo Cademartiri; Roberto Lagalla; Massimo Midiri
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of regadenoson stress echocardiography: concordance with gated-spect myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Ignacio Iglesias-Garriz; Javier Vara-Manso; Ana Sevilla; Felix Corral; Jose A Lastra; Eladio Rodríguez; Carmen Garrote; Samuel Del Castillo; Carmen de la Fuente; Felipe Fernandez-Vazquez
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.357

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.