Literature DB >> 16027431

Older women's health priorities and perceptions of care delivery: results of the WOW health survey.

Cara Tannenbaum1, Nancy Mayo, Francine Ducharme.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As women get older, their health priorities change. We surveyed a sample of older Canadian women to investigate what health priorities are of concern to them, their perceptions about the care delivered to address these priorities and the extent to which priorities and perceptions of care differ across age groups and provinces.
METHODS: The WOW (What Older women Want) cross-sectional health survey was mailed in October 2003 to 5000 community-dwelling women aged 55-95 years from 10 Canadian provinces. Women were asked questions on 26 health priorities according to the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, and their perceptions of whether these priorities were being addressed by health care providers through screening or counselling. Differences in priorities and perceptions of care delivery were examined across age groups and provinces.
RESULTS: The response rate was 52%. The mean age of the respondents was 71 (standard deviation 7) years. The health priorities identified most frequently by the respondents were preventing memory loss (88% of the respondents), learning about the side effects of medications (88%) and correcting vision impairment (86%). Items least frequently selected were counselling about community programs (28%), counselling about exercise (33%) and pneumonia vaccination (33%). Up to 97% of the women recalled being adequately screened for heart disease and stroke risk factors, but as little as 11% reported receiving counselling regarding concerns about memory loss or end-of-life issues. Women who stated that specific priorities were of great concern or importance to them were more than twice as likely as those who stated that they were not of great concern or importance to perceive that these priorities were being addressed: osteoporosis (odds ratio [OR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1- 3.2), end-of-life care (OR 2.6, 95% CI 2.0-3.4), anxiety reduction (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.8-2.6), fall prevention (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.6-2.7), stroke (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.0), depression (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.7-2.7) and urinary incontinence (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.7-2.5). The respondents' perceptions of care delivery varied across age groups and provinces.
INTERPRETATION: According to the perceptions of surveyed women, health care providers are addressing many, but not all, of their health concerns, especially those that are of great concern or importance to these women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16027431      PMCID: PMC1174854          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  14 in total

1.  Health survey data on potentially inappropriate geriatric drug use.

Authors:  Claudine Laurier; Yola Moride; Wendy A Kennedy
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.154

2.  National health surveys by mail or home interview: effects on response.

Authors:  H S Picavet
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  A comparison of self-reported colorectal cancer screening with medical records.

Authors:  Lisa Madlensky; John McLaughlin; Vivek Goel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Screening for cognitive impairment and dementia in the elderly.

Authors:  C J Patterson; D A Gass
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer; Kate Lorig; Halsted Holman; Kevin Grumbach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group.

Authors:  W M Hopman; T Towheed; T Anastassiades; A Tenenhouse; S Poliquin; C Berger; L Joseph; J P Brown; T M Murray; J D Adachi; D A Hanley; E Papadimitropoulos
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-08-08       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Older adults' views of "successful aging"--how do they compare with researchers' definitions?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Phelan; Lynda A Anderson; Andrea Z LaCroix; Eric B Larson
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Women's health priorities and perceptions of care: a survey to identify opportunities for improving preventative health care delivery for older women.

Authors:  Cara Tannenbaum; Nancy Mayo
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.668

9.  The Short-Form 36 and older people: some problems encountered when using postal administration.

Authors:  S Mallinson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  The end of the disease era.

Authors:  Mary E Tinetti; Terri Fried
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  15 in total

1.  New insights into the health priorities and needs of older women.

Authors:  Elizabeth Phelan; James LoGerfo
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  What drives older women's perceptions of health-related quality of life?

Authors:  Cara Tannenbaum; Sara Ahmed; Nancy Mayo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Patient-Oriented Policies To Reduce The Harmful Effects Of Medication On Seniors' Brain Function.

Authors:  Lori A Daiello; Cara Tannenbaum
Journal:  Public Policy Aging Rep       Date:  2018-09-28

Review 4.  Strategies to promote public engagement around deprescribing.

Authors:  Justin P Turner; Janet Currie; Johanna Trimble; Cara Tannenbaum
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2018-09-12

5.  Priority setting in general practice: health priorities of older patients differ from treatment priorities of their physicians.

Authors:  Isabel Voigt; Jennifer Wrede; Heike Diederichs-Egidi; Marie-Luise Dierks; Ulrike Junius-Walker
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.351

6.  Critical impact of patient knowledge and bone density testing on starting osteoporosis treatment after fragility fracture: secondary analyses from two controlled trials.

Authors:  S R Majumdar; F A McAlister; J A Johnson; D L Weir; D Bellerose; D A Hanley; A S Russell; B H Rowe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  The impact of genetic research on our understanding of normal cognitive ageing: 1995 to 2009.

Authors:  Antony Payton
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 7.444

8.  Exercise and nutrition in older Canadian women: opportunities for community intervention.

Authors:  Cara Tannenbaum; Bryna Shatenstein
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2007 May-Jun

9.  A consumer-targeted, pharmacist-led, educational intervention to reduce inappropriate medication use in community older adults (D-PRESCRIBE trial): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Philippe Martin; Robyn Tamblyn; Sara Ahmed; Andrea Benedetti; Cara Tannenbaum
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  A genome-wide association study implicates the APOE locus in nonpathological cognitive ageing.

Authors:  G Davies; S E Harris; C A Reynolds; A Payton; H M Knight; D C Liewald; L M Lopez; M Luciano; A J Gow; J Corley; R Henderson; C Murray; A Pattie; H C Fox; P Redmond; M W Lutz; O Chiba-Falek; C Linnertz; S Saith; P Haggarty; G McNeill; X Ke; W Ollier; M Horan; A D Roses; C P Ponting; D J Porteous; A Tenesa; A Pickles; J M Starr; L J Whalley; N L Pedersen; N Pendleton; P M Visscher; I J Deary
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 15.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.