Literature DB >> 8605897

Double-blind randomized study of 1 g versus 2 g intravenous ceftriaxone daily in the therapy of community-acquired infections.

S Segev1, R Raz, E Rubinstein, H Shmuely, D Hassin, N Rosen, E Platau, S Ben Assuli, S Pitlik.   

Abstract

In a multicentre, double-blind, randomized study involving four general hospitals in Israel, the efficacy and safety of ceftriaxone 1 g/day i.v. was compared to that of 2 g/day i.v. in the treatment of moderate to severe community-acquired infections requiring hospitalization. Two hundred and twenty-two patients were enrolled; 112 received intravenous ceftriaxone 1 g/day, and 110 received 2 g/day. The two groups were matched demographically, and their mean APACHE II score (10 points) and mean duration of successful therapy (7 days) were identical. The sites of infection in the 1 g and 2 g groups respectively were lower respiratory tract in 57 versus 51 patients, urinary tract in 31 versus 40 patients, and soft tissue in 24 versus 19 patients. There were no significant differences in clinical outcome between the 1 g and 2 g groups, the outcome being cure in 91% versus 86% of patients, improvement in 3% versus 3% of patients, failure in 3% versus 8% of patients, and relapse in 3% versus 3% of patients. The findings of this study indicate that ceftriaxone 1 g/day is as effective as 2 g/day in the treatment of moderate to severe community-acquired infections. The low-dose form is a more economical means of treating these infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8605897     DOI: 10.1007/bf01691490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  18 in total

1.  Treatment of streptococcal endocarditis with a single daily dose of ceftriaxone sodium for 4 weeks. Efficacy and outpatient treatment feasibility.

Authors:  P Francioli; J Etienne; R Hoigné; J P Thys; A Gerber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-01-08       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Treatment of various infections in an outpatient practice by intramuscular ceftriaxone: home parenteral therapy.

Authors:  G N Karachalios; A N Georgiopoulos; S Kanatakis
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.544

3.  Pefloxacin versus ceftazidime in therapy of soft tissue infections in compromised patients.

Authors:  S Segev; N Rosen; S D Pitlik; C Block; E Rubinstein
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Once-daily therapy with ceftriaxone compared with daily multiple-dose therapy with cefotaxime for serious bacterial infections: a randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  L A Mandell; M G Bergeron; A R Ronald; C Vega; G Harding; R Saginur; R Feld; R Duperval; S J Landis; L J Miedzinski
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Once-daily ceftriaxone in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  R Brown
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.544

6.  Outcome of a ceftriaxone/cefotaxime interchange programme in a major teaching hospital.

Authors:  A Gutensohn; D Bunz; L Frighetto; P Jewesson
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.544

7.  Treatment of lower respiratory tract infections with ceftriaxone and cefotaxime. A comparative study.

Authors:  G F Abbate; I Alagia; E Giaquinto; V Leonessa; L Savioli; P Altucci; M Caputi; C Guarino; E Micillo; E Catena
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.580

8.  Ceftriaxone therapy in otolaryngological and pulmonary infections.

Authors:  F Fraschini; P C Braga; M Falchi; G Gattei; F Scaglione; G Scarpazza; D Esposti
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.544

9.  Treatment of septic burns with a third-generation cephalosporin (cefatriaxon).

Authors:  E J Theron; C J Nel
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1983-11-12

10.  Single daily dose treatment of severe refractory infections with ceftriaxone. Cost savings and possible parenteral outpatient treatment.

Authors:  J D Baumgartner; M P Glauser
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1983-10
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Rational prescribing of antibacterials in hospitalised children.

Authors:  J E Hoppe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Cost-effectiveness of ceftriaxone 1 g vs second-generation cephalosporins in the treatment of pneumonia in general medical wards in Germany.

Authors:  E S Dietrich; U Joseph; F Vogel; S Howaldt; K H Kullmann; U Frank; F D Daschner
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes among Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving One or Two Grams of Ceftriaxone Daily.

Authors:  Andrew Ackerman; Nathaniel R Zook; Jeremy F Siegrist; Charles F Brummitt; Margaret M Cook; Thomas J Dilworth
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  1g versus 2 g daily intravenous ceftriaxone in the treatment of community onset pneumonia - a propensity score analysis of data from a Japanese multicenter registry.

Authors:  Shinya Hasegawa; Ryuichi Sada; Makito Yaegashi; Konosuke Morimoto; Takahiro Mori
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.090

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.