Literature DB >> 3515468

Treatment of lower respiratory tract infections with ceftriaxone and cefotaxime. A comparative study.

G F Abbate, I Alagia, E Giaquinto, V Leonessa, L Savioli, P Altucci, M Caputi, C Guarino, E Micillo, E Catena.   

Abstract

The microbiological and clinico-therapeutic efficacy and safety of ceftriaxone were compared with those of cefotaxime in an open randomized trial. Fifty-four adult hospitalized patients (37 males and 17 females) suffering from either acute bronchopneumonia (19) or acute exacerbations of chronic bronchopneumonia (35) have been investigated. Four patients were withdrawn from the trial. Underlying diseases were present in 41 patients. Ceftriaxone was administered at a once-a-day dose of either 1 or 2 g (in 13 and 14 patients, respectively) and cefotaxime at a 2 g twice daily dosing regimen (27 patients), both antibiotics being given for 7-12 days. In the ceftriaxone group, 15 out of the 27 patients were cured (55%) and 9 had a favourable clinical response for a total satisfactory response rate of 88%. The causative pathogen was eliminated in 18 (66%) patients. The results obtained in the cefotaxime group did not differ significantly, but 2 patients were excluded from the study because of in vitro resistance of the causative pathogen isolated. Both drugs were well tolerated: no relevant laboratory changes were registered. The results indicate that ceftriaxone at a dosage of 2 or 1 g daily is at least as effective as cefotaxime given daily at a dosage of 4 g in the treatment of severe lower respiratory tract infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3515468     DOI: 10.1159/000194882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respiration        ISSN: 0025-7931            Impact factor:   3.580


  8 in total

1.  Antimicrobial activity of ceftriaxone compared with cefotaxime in the presence of serum albumin.

Authors:  S K Nath; G A Foster; L A Mandell; C Rotstein
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1995-01

Review 2.  Systemic antibiotic treatment of nosocomial pneumonia.

Authors:  K E Unertl; F P Lenhart; H Forst; K Peter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  A multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  T M File; J Segreti; L Dunbar; R Player; R Kohler; R R Williams; C Kojak; A Rubin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Double-blind randomized study of 1 g versus 2 g intravenous ceftriaxone daily in the therapy of community-acquired infections.

Authors:  S Segev; R Raz; E Rubinstein; H Shmuely; D Hassin; N Rosen; E Platau; S Ben Assuli; S Pitlik
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 5.  Ceftriaxone. A reappraisal of its antibacterial activity and pharmacokinetic properties, and an update on its therapeutic use with particular reference to once-daily administration.

Authors:  R N Brogden; A Ward
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Cefotaxime. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use.

Authors:  P A Todd; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Drug utilisation review (DUR) of the third generation cephalosporins. Focus on ceftriaxone, ceftazidime and cefotaxime.

Authors:  A Adu; C L Armour
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone.

Authors:  J H Yuk; C H Nightingale; R Quintiliani
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 6.447

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.