Literature DB >> 32205348

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes among Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving One or Two Grams of Ceftriaxone Daily.

Andrew Ackerman1, Nathaniel R Zook1, Jeremy F Siegrist2, Charles F Brummitt3, Margaret M Cook1, Thomas J Dilworth4.   

Abstract

Intensive care unit (ICU) patients may experience ceftriaxone underexposure, but clinical outcomes data are lacking. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of ceftriaxone dosing on clinical outcomes among ICU patients without central nervous system (CNS) infection. A retrospective study of ICU patients receiving intravenous, empirical ceftriaxone for non-CNS infections was conducted. Patients ≥18 years of age who received ≤2 g of ceftriaxone daily for ≥72 h were included and categorized as receiving ceftriaxone 1 g or 2 g daily. The primary, composite outcome was treatment failure, defined as inpatient mortality and/or antibiotic escalation due to clinical worsening. Propensity score matching was performed based on the probability of receiving 2 g of ceftriaxone daily. Multivariable logistic regression determined the association between ceftriaxone dose and treatment failure in a propensity-matched cohort. A total of 212 patients were included in the propensity-matched cohort. The most common diagnoses (83.0%) were pneumonia and urinary tract infection. Treatment failure occurred in 17.0% and 5.7% of patients receiving 1 g and 2 g daily, respectively (P = 0.0156). Overall inpatient mortality was 8.5%. Ceftriaxone 2 g dosing was associated with a reduced likelihood of treatment failure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.190; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.059 to 0.607). Other independent predictors of treatment failure included sequential organ failure assessment score (aOR = 1.440; 95% CI = 1.254 to 1.653) and creatinine clearance at 72 h from ceftriaxone initiation (aOR = 0.980; 95% CI = 0.971 to 0.999). Therefore, ceftriaxone at 2 g daily, when used as appropriate antimicrobial coverage, may be appropriate for ICU patients with lower mortality risk.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ceftriaxone; clinical outcomes; intensive care unit; pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32205348      PMCID: PMC7269488          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00066-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  22 in total

1.  A retrospective comparison of ceftriaxone versus oxacillin for osteoarticular infections due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Brent W Wieland; Jodie R Marcantoni; Kerry M Bommarito; David K Warren; Jonas Marschall
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Effect of baseline serum albumin concentration on outcome of resuscitation with albumin or saline in patients in intensive care units: analysis of data from the saline versus albumin fluid evaluation (SAFE) study.

Authors:  Simon Finfer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Suzanne McEvoy; Sing Kai Lo; John Myburgh; Bruce Neal; Robyn Norton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-10-13

3.  Early reversible acute kidney injury is associated with improved survival in septic shock.

Authors:  Manish M Sood; Leigh Anne Shafer; Julie Ho; Martina Reslerova; Greg Martinka; Sean Keenan; Sandra Dial; Gordon Wood; Claudio Rigatto; Anand Kumar
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.425

4.  Tolerability of high-dose ceftriaxone in CNS infections: a prospective multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Paul Le Turnier; Dominique Navas; Denis Garot; Thomas Guimard; Louis Bernard; Pierre Tattevin; Yves Marie Vandamme; Jérôme Hoff; Anne Chiffoleau; Martin Dary; Laurene Leclair-Visonneau; Matthieu Grégoire; Morgane Pere; David Boutoille; Véronique Sébille; Eric Dailly; Nathalie Asseray
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 5.  The effects of hypoalbuminaemia on optimizing antibacterial dosing in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Marta Ulldemolins; Jason A Roberts; Jordi Rello; David L Paterson; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Is continuous infusion ceftriaxone better than once-a-day dosing in intensive care? A randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Rob Boots; Claire M Rickard; Peter Thomas; Jo Quinn; Darren M Roberts; Brent Richards; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Protein binding of β-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients: can we successfully predict unbound concentrations?

Authors:  Gloria Wong; Scott Briscoe; Syamhanin Adnan; Brett McWhinney; Jacobus Ungerer; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Changes in ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics during the early phase of sepsis: a prospective, experimental study in the rat.

Authors:  Valentina Selmi; Beatrice Loriga; Luca Vitali; Martina Carlucci; Alessandro Di Filippo; Giulio Carta; Eleonora Sgambati; Lorenzo Tofani; Angelo Raffaele De Gaudio; Andrea Novelli; Chiara Adembri
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 9.  Renal recovery after acute kidney injury.

Authors:  L G Forni; M Darmon; M Ostermann; H M Oudemans-van Straaten; V Pettilä; J R Prowle; M Schetz; M Joannidis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  DALI: defining antibiotic levels in intensive care unit patients: are current β-lactam antibiotic doses sufficient for critically ill patients?

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Sanjoy K Paul; Murat Akova; Matteo Bassetti; Jan J De Waele; George Dimopoulos; Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen; Despoina Koulenti; Claude Martin; Philippe Montravers; Jordi Rello; Andrew Rhodes; Therese Starr; Steven C Wallis; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.