Literature DB >> 2668427

Once-daily therapy with ceftriaxone compared with daily multiple-dose therapy with cefotaxime for serious bacterial infections: a randomized, double-blind study.

L A Mandell1, M G Bergeron, A R Ronald, C Vega, G Harding, R Saginur, R Feld, R Duperval, S J Landis, L J Miedzinski.   

Abstract

A randomized, double-blind study was done to compare the efficacy and toxicity of daily single-dose therapy with intravenous ceftriaxone (2 g every 24 h) with daily multiple-dose therapy with cefotaxime (2 g every 6 h) for treatment of serious bacterial infections in nonneutropenic patients. Of the 325 patients who were evaluable for toxicity, 241 (74.2%) were evaluable for efficacy. Infection sites included lung (106), urinary tract (42), skin and soft tissue (43), bone and joint (23), bacteremia (21), and hepatobiliary (5). Definite infections were present in 173 cases (71.8%) and possible infections in 68 (28.2%). Analysis of clinical and bacteriologic responses and adverse drug reactions showed no significant differences between the regimens. Values for 95% confidence limits on the differences between regimens for positive clinical and bacteriological outcomes in definite infections were -0.8% to 3.0% and -1.9% to 9.1%, respectively. Thus, daily single-dose therapy with ceftriaxone was comparable to daily multiple-dose therapy with cefotaxime in treating these bacterial infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2668427     DOI: 10.1093/infdis/160.3.433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  19 in total

1.  A retrospective comparison of ceftriaxone versus oxacillin for osteoarticular infections due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Brent W Wieland; Jodie R Marcantoni; Kerry M Bommarito; David K Warren; Jonas Marschall
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use of cephalosporins.

Authors:  D Kalman; S L Barriere
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1990

3.  Multicentre clinical trials in infectious diseases in Canada.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1992-03

4.  Antimicrobial activity of ceftriaxone compared with cefotaxime in the presence of serum albumin.

Authors:  S K Nath; G A Foster; L A Mandell; C Rotstein
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1995-01

5.  Spreadsheet software program to analyse costs beyond drug acquisition price.

Authors:  J A Paladino
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Systemic antibiotic treatment of nosocomial pneumonia.

Authors:  K E Unertl; F P Lenhart; H Forst; K Peter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Effects of a restrictive antibiotic policy on clinical efficacy of antibiotics and susceptibility patterns of organisms.

Authors:  A W Sturm
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  The economic impact of once-daily versus conventional administration of gentamicin and tobramycin.

Authors:  H Mithani; G Brown
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  An assessment of the hidden and total antibiotic costs of four parenteral cephalosporins.

Authors:  E T Smyth; J G Barr; C A O'Neill; G M Hogg
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  A prospective randomized trial of imipenem-cilastatin versus clindamycin/tobramycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal and pelvic infections.

Authors:  L A Mandell; P L Turgeon; A R Ronalds
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1993-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.