Literature DB >> 10436073

Head direction cells in rats with hippocampal or overlying neocortical lesions: evidence for impaired angular path integration.

E J Golob1, J S Taube.   

Abstract

Rodents use two distinct navigation strategies that are based on environmental cues (landmark navigation) or internal cues (path integration). Head direction (HD) cells are neurons that discharge when the animal points its head in a particular direction and are responsive to the same cues that support path integration and landmark navigation. Experiment 1 examined whether HD cells in rats with lesions to the hippocampus plus the overlying neocortex or to just the overlying neocortex could maintain a stable preferred firing direction when the rats locomoted from a familiar to a novel environment, a process thought to require path integration. HD cells from both lesion groups were unable to maintain a similar preferred direction between environments, with cells from hippocampal rats showing larger shifts than cells from rats sustaining only cortical damage. When the rats first explored the novel environment, the preferred directions of the cells drifted for up to 4 min before establishing a consistent firing orientation. The preferred direction was usually maintained during subsequent visits to the novel environment but not across longer time periods (days to weeks). Experiment 2 demonstrated that a novel landmark cue was able to establish control over HD cell preferred directions in rats from both lesion groups, showing that the impairment observed in experiment 1 cannot be attributed to an impairment in establishing cue control. Experiment 3 showed that the preferred direction drifted when HD cells in lesioned animals were recorded in the dark. It was also shown that the anticipatory property of anterodorsal thalamic nucleus HD cells was still present in lesioned animals; thus, this property cannot be attributed to an intact hippocampus. These findings suggest that the hippocampus and the overlying neocortex are involved in path integration mechanisms, which enable an animal to maintain an accurate representation of its directional heading when exploring a novel environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10436073      PMCID: PMC6782884     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  37 in total

1.  Hippocampal electrical activity in arousal.

Authors:  J D GREEN; A A ARDUINI
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1954-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. II. Effects of environmental manipulations.

Authors:  J S Taube; R U Muller; J B Ranck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Hippocampal lesions and path integration.

Authors:  I Q Whishaw; J E McKenna; H Maaswinkel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Effects of hippocampal manipulations on the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response: simulations by an attentional-associative model.

Authors:  N A Schmajuk; J W Moore
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1989-03-01       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Hippocampal lesions disrupt decrements but not increments in conditioned stimulus processing.

Authors:  J S Han; M Gallagher; P Holland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A driveable bundle of microwires for collecting single-unit data from freely-moving rats.

Authors:  J L Kubie
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1984-01

7.  Cue control and head direction cells.

Authors:  J P Goodridge; P A Dudchenko; K A Worboys; E J Golob; J S Taube
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Rats with fimbria-fornix lesions are impaired in path integration: a role for the hippocampus in "sense of direction".

Authors:  I Q Whishaw; H Maaswinkel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Interaction between the postsubiculum and anterior thalamus in the generation of head direction cell activity.

Authors:  J P Goodridge; J S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Preferential use of the landmark navigational system by head direction cells in rats.

Authors:  J P Goodridge; J S Taube
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  27 in total

1.  Environmental Geometry Aligns the Hippocampal Map during Spatial Reorientation.

Authors:  Alex T Keinath; Joshua B Julian; Russell A Epstein; Isabel A Muzzio
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Acetylcholine contributes to the integration of self-movement cues in head direction cells.

Authors:  Ryan M Yoder; Jeremy H M Chan; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Intact landmark control and angular path integration by head direction cells in the anterodorsal thalamus after lesions of the medial entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Benjamin J Clark; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.899

4.  Visual landmark information gains control of the head direction signal at the lateral mammillary nuclei.

Authors:  Ryan M Yoder; James R Peck; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Testing the Efficacy of Single-Cell Stimulation in Biasing Presubicular Head Direction Activity.

Authors:  Stefano Coletta; Markus Frey; Khaled Nasr; Patricia Preston-Ferrer; Andrea Burgalossi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Impaired head direction cell representation in the anterodorsal thalamus after lesions of the retrosplenial cortex.

Authors:  Benjamin J Clark; Joshua P Bassett; Sarah S Wang; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  On the nature of three-dimensional encoding in the cognitive map: Commentary on Hayman, Verriotis, Jovalekic, Fenton, and Jeffery.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Taube; Michael Shinder
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 8.  Theoretical accounts of spatial learning: a neurobiological view (commentary on Pearce, 2009).

Authors:  Kathryn J Jeffery
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Head direction cell instability in the anterior dorsal thalamus after lesions of the interpeduncular nucleus.

Authors:  Benjamin J Clark; Asha Sarma; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Where am I and how will I get there from here? A role for posterior parietal cortex in the integration of spatial information and route planning.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Calton; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.