Literature DB >> 8582870

Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forages by ruminants.

H G Jung1, M S Allen.   

Abstract

Even under the intensive concentrate feeding systems of ruminant animal production in the United States, forages continue to represent the single most important feed resource. Cell-wall concentration and digestibility limit the intake potential and energy availability of forage crops in beef and dairy production. Identification of cell-wall characteristics that should be targets of genetic modification is required if plant breeders and molecular biologists are to successfully improve forages for livestock feeding. As the forage plant cell develops, phenolic acids and lignin are deposited in the maturing cell wall in specific structural conformations, and in a strict developmental sequence. Lignin is the key element that limits cell-wall digestibility, but cross-linkage of lignin and wall polysaccharides by ferulic acid bridges may be a prerequisite for lignin to exert its affect. Lignin composition and p-coumaric acid in the wall are less likely to affect digestibility. Voluntary intake of forages is a critical determinant of animal performance and cell-wall concentration is negatively related to intake of ruminants consuming high-forage diets. Cell walls affect intake by contributing to ruminal fill. A simple model of cell-wall digestion and passage in which ruminal fill is a function of rates of digestion and passage, as well as the indigestible fraction of the cell-wall indicates that cell-wall concentration and rate of passage are the most critical parameters determining ruminal fill. Plant factors that affect rate of passage include those that affect particle size reduction by chewing and those that affect particle buoyancy in the rumen. The latter is primarily affected by 1) the ability of the particulate matter to retain gases, which is probably related to plant anatomy and rate of digestion of the plant tissue, and 2) the rate at which the gas is produced, which is affected by the potentially digestible fraction of the particulate matter and the rate of digestion of this fraction. Increasing rate of digestion should increase rate of passage by diminishing the gas produced and increasing density over time. A reduction in the indigestible cell-wall fraction is beneficial because this will decrease fill and increase digestibility. Animal production and economic benefits from reduced cell-wall concentration and increased digestibility are significant. Because of the high cell-wall concentration and large digestible cell-wall fraction of grasses, reduction in cell-wall concentration would probably be of greater value than improving digestibility in these species. Legumes represent the opposite situation and may benefit more from improvements in the digestibility of their cell walls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8582870     DOI: 10.2527/1995.7392774x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  52 in total

1.  Effect of plant maturity and germplasm on in situ rumen degradability and rate of passage of alfalfa hay.

Authors:  M Dorigo; F Gottardo; P Berzaghi; G Cozzi
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Solution-state 2D NMR of ball-milled plant cell wall gels in DMSO-d(6)/pyridine-d(5).

Authors:  Hoon Kim; John Ralph
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 3.  Biotechnological advancements in alfalfa improvement.

Authors:  Suresh Kumar
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  New recombinant fibrolytic enzymes for improved in vitro ruminal fiber degradability of barley straw1.

Authors:  Gabriel O Ribeiro; Ajay Badhan; Jiangli Huang; Karen A Beauchemin; Wenzhu Yang; Yuxi Wang; Adrian Tsang; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Whole plant cell wall characterization using solution-state 2D NMR.

Authors:  Shawn D Mansfield; Hoon Kim; Fachuang Lu; John Ralph
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Effects of source and concentration of neutral detergent fiber from roughage in beef cattle diets on feed intake, ingestive behavior, and ruminal kinetics.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Goulart; Ricardo A M Vieira; Joao L P Daniel; Rafael C Amaral; Vanessa P Santos; Sergio G Toledo Filho; Edward H Cabezas-Garcia; Luis O Tedeschi; Luiz G Nussio
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Genetic variations of cell wall digestibility related traits in floral stems of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions as a basis for the improvement of the feeding value in maize and forage plants.

Authors:  Y Barrière; D Denoue; M Briand; M Simon; L Jouanin; M Durand-Tardif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Dilute acid pretreatment of sorghum biomass to maximize the hemicellulose hydrolysis with minimized levels of fermentative inhibitors for bioethanol production.

Authors:  Narendra Naik Deshavath; Mood Mohan; Venkata Dasu Veeranki; Vaibhav V Goud; Srinivasa Rao Pinnamaneni; Tamal Benarjee
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.406

9.  4-O-methylation of glucuronic acid in Arabidopsis glucuronoxylan is catalyzed by a domain of unknown function family 579 protein.

Authors:  Breeanna R Urbanowicz; Maria J Peña; Supriya Ratnaparkhe; Utku Avci; Jason Backe; Heather F Steet; Marcus Foston; Hongjia Li; Malcolm A O'Neill; Arthur J Ragauskas; Alan G Darvill; Charles Wyman; Harry J Gilbert; William S York
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Down-regulation of four putative arabinoxylan feruloyl transferase genes from family PF02458 reduces ester-linked ferulate content in rice cell walls.

Authors:  Fernando Piston; Cristobal Uauy; Lianhai Fu; James Langston; John Labavitch; Jorge Dubcovsky
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.