Literature DB >> 30053012

New recombinant fibrolytic enzymes for improved in vitro ruminal fiber degradability of barley straw1.

Gabriel O Ribeiro1,2, Ajay Badhan2, Jiangli Huang3, Karen A Beauchemin2, Wenzhu Yang2, Yuxi Wang2, Adrian Tsang4, Tim A McAllister2.   

Abstract

This study used a high-throughput in vitro microassay, in vitro batch culture, and the Rumen Simulation Technique (RUSITEC) to screen recombinant fibrolytic enzymes for their ability to increase the ruminal fiber degradability of barley straw. Eleven different recombinant enzymes in combination with a crude mixture of rumen enzymes (50% recombinant enzyme:50% crude mixture of rumen enzymes) were compared with the crude mixture of rumen enzymes alone. In the microassay, all treatments were applied at 15 mg of protein load per gram barley straw glucan. Based on the microassay results, 1 recombinant endoglucanase [EGL7A, from the glycoside hydrolase (GH) family 7], 2 recombinant xylanases (XYL10A and XYL10C, from GH10), and a recombinant enzyme mixture were selected and compared with a crude mixture of fibrolytic enzymes from Aspergillus aculeatus for their ability to hydrolyze barley straw. For batch culture, enzymes were applied to barley straw at 2 dosages (100 and 500 µg of protein/g of substrate DM). All enzymes increased (P < 0.05) DM disappearance and total VFA production, but the mixture of recombinant enzymes was not superior to the use of a single recombinant enzyme. Based on positive results (P < 0.05) for total DM disappearance and VFA production in batch culture, 3 enzymes (EGL7A, XYL10A, and XYL10C) were selected and applied to barley straw at 500 µg of protein per gram for further assessment in RUSITECs fed a concentrate:barley straw diet (300:700 g/kg DM). In RUSITECs, the recombinant enzyme XYL10A increased (P < 0.05) barley straw DM, NDF, and ADF disappearance, whereas EGL7A and XYL10C had no effect. The enzymes selected based on the high-throughput in vitro microassay consistently increased barley straw degradation in ruminal batch culture, but not in the semicontinuous culture RUSITEC system. © Crown copyright 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RUSITEC; fiber; fibrolytic enzymes; in vitro; rumen bacteria; straw

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30053012      PMCID: PMC6127823          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  20 in total

Review 1.  Board-invited review: Opportunities and challenges in using exogenous enzymes to improve ruminant production.

Authors:  S J Meale; K A Beauchemin; A N Hristov; A V Chaves; T A McAllister
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Extensive sampling of basidiomycete genomes demonstrates inadequacy of the white-rot/brown-rot paradigm for wood decay fungi.

Authors:  Robert Riley; Asaf A Salamov; Daren W Brown; Laszlo G Nagy; Dimitrios Floudas; Benjamin W Held; Anthony Levasseur; Vincent Lombard; Emmanuelle Morin; Robert Otillar; Erika A Lindquist; Hui Sun; Kurt M LaButti; Jeremy Schmutz; Dina Jabbour; Hong Luo; Scott E Baker; Antonio G Pisabarro; Jonathan D Walton; Robert A Blanchette; Bernard Henrissat; Francis Martin; Dan Cullen; David S Hibbett; Igor V Grigoriev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Synergy between ruminal fibrolytic enzymes and enzymes from Trichoderma longibrachiatum.

Authors:  D P Morgavi; K A Beauchemin; V L Nsereko; L M Rode; A D Iwaasa; W Z Yang; T A McAllister; Y Wang
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Effects of brown midrib 3 mutation in corn silage on productivity of dairy cows fed two concentrations of dietary neutral detergent fiber: 3. Digestibility and microbial efficiency.

Authors:  M Oba; M S Allen
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Effect of fibrolytic enzymes added to a Andropogon gayanus grass silage-concentrate diet on rumen fermentation in batch cultures and the artificial rumen (Rusitec).

Authors:  G O Ribeiro; L C Gonçalves; L G R Pereira; A V Chaves; Y Wang; K A Beauchemin; T A McAllister
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Rumen microbial (meta)genomics and its application to ruminant production.

Authors:  D P Morgavi; W J Kelly; P H Janssen; G T Attwood
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Influence of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes and fumarate on methane production, microbial growth and fermentation in Rusitec fermenters.

Authors:  L A Giraldo; M J Ranilla; M L Tejido; M D Carro
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 8.  Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects.

Authors:  Philip K Thornton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Ruminant Nutrition Symposium: Improving cell wall digestion and animal performance with fibrolytic enzymes.

Authors:  A T Adesogan; Z X Ma; J J Romero; K G Arriola
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Optimisation of enzymatic hydrolysis of apple pomace for production of biofuel and biorefinery chemicals using commercial enzymes.

Authors:  Repson Gama; J Susan Van Dyk; Brett I Pletschke
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.406

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effect of ammonia fiber expansion-treated wheat straw and a recombinant fibrolytic enzyme on rumen microbiota and fermentation parameters, total tract digestibility, and performance of lambs.

Authors:  Gabriel O Ribeiro; Robert J Gruninger; Darryl R Jones; Karen A Beauchemin; Wen Zhu Yang; Yuxi Wang; D Wade Abbott; Adrian Tsang; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effect of ergot alkaloids and a mycotoxin deactivating product on in vitro ruminal fermentation using the Rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC).

Authors:  Jenna M Sarich; Kim Stanford; Karen S Schwartzkopf-Genswein; Robert J Gruninger; Tim A McAllister; Sarah J Meale; Barry R Blakley; Gregory B Penner; Gabriel O Ribeiro
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.338

3.  In Vitro Estimation of the Effect of Grinding on Rumen Fermentation of Fibrous Feeds.

Authors:  Ignacio Rubén Ortolani; Zahia Amanzougarene; Manuel Fondevila
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Pretreatment of Rapeseed Meal Increases Its Recalcitrant Fiber Fermentation and Alters the Microbial Community in an in vitro Model of Swine Large Intestine.

Authors:  Cheng Long; Koen Venema
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Mechanistic insights into the digestion of complex dietary fibre by the rumen microbiota using combinatorial high-resolution glycomics and transcriptomic analyses.

Authors:  Ajay Badhan; Kristin E Low; Darryl R Jones; Xiaohui Xing; Mohammad Raza Marami Milani; Rodrigo Ortega Polo; Leeann Klassen; Sivasankari Venketachalam; Michael G Hahn; D Wade Abbott; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 7.271

6.  Ecofriendly Usability of Mushroom Cultivation Substrate as a Ruminant Feed: Anaerobic Digestion Using Gas Production Techniques.

Authors:  Valiollah Palangi; Adem Kaya; Ali Kaya; Ilias Giannenas
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-19       Impact factor: 3.231

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.