Literature DB >> 20072092

Lumbar spine flexion and extension extremes of motion in women of different age and racial groups: the WIN Study.

Elaine Trudelle-Jackson1, Lisa Ann Fleisher, Nicole Borman, James R Morrow, Georita M Frierson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Observational.
OBJECTIVE: To provide normative values of lumbar flexion and extension for women of different age and racial groups. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal range of motion (ROM) is one of the AMA Guides criteria used to estimate level of impairment and subsequent compensation entitlement. Studies show that spinal ROM varies with age, gender, and possibly race/ethnicity, but adequate normative values for different age and racial/ethnic groups do not exist.
METHODS: A cohort of free-living women was recruited for the Women's Injury Study at The Cooper Institute in Dallas. Originally, 917 women between the ages of 20 and 83 (M = 52 +/- 13) underwent an orthopedic examination including lumbar spine flexion and extension measurement using an electronic inclinometer. Measurements were taken in the fully extended and flexed positions, respectively. This removes the influence of initial resting posture and is termed "extreme of motion" (EOM) as opposed to ROM. Age and racial groups were compared using a 2-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) followed with post hoc tests.
RESULTS: Means (+/-SD) were calculated for racial (white, N = 619, African-American, N = 147) and age groups (young, 20-39 years, n = 126; middle, 40-59 years, n = 412; older, > or = 60 years, n = 228). Lumbar extension for African-American women (60.1 degrees) was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than for white women (52.6 degrees), but flexion was not different (15.2 degrees and 17.0 degrees), respectively. Extension EOM for the young group (61.6 degrees) was greater (P < 0.05) than the middle (56.6 degrees) and older (50.8 degrees) groups. Extension difference between the middle and older groups was significant. Flexion EOM for the young group (20.1 degrees) was greater (P < 0.05) than the middle (15.2 degrees) and older (12.8 degrees) groups. The difference in flexion between the middle and older groups was not significant.
CONCLUSION: Normative values of lumbar extension are different for white and African-American women. Values for lumbar flexion and extension are different between age groups. Different criteria should be used to estimate impairment level in women of different racial and age groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20072092      PMCID: PMC2888885          DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b0c3d1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

1.  Three-dimensional lumbar spinal kinematics: a study of range of movement in 100 healthy subjects aged 20 to 60+ years.

Authors:  G Van Herp; P Rowe; P Salter; J P Paul
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.580

2.  Recommendations to guide revision of the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. American Medical Association.

Authors:  E A Spieler; P S Barth; J F Burton; J Himmelstein; L Rudolph
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-01-26       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The influence of initial resting posture on range of motion of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  J E Coates; A H McGregor; I D Beith; S P Hughes
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2001-08

4.  A new, comprehensive normative database of lumbar spine ranges of motion.

Authors:  M Troke; A P Moore; F J Maillardet; A Hough; E Cheek
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.477

5.  Objective assessment with establishment of normal values for lumbar spinal range of motion.

Authors:  G K Fitzgerald; K J Wynveen; W Rheault; B Rothschild
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1983-11

6.  Measurement of spinal posture and range of spinal movement.

Authors:  W Y Loebl
Journal:  Ann Phys Med       Date:  1967-08

7.  Differences in measurements of lumbar curvature related to gender and low back pain.

Authors:  Barbara J Norton; Shirley A Sahrmann; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Heritability of lumbar flexibility and the role of disc degeneration and body weight.

Authors:  Michele C Battié; Esko Levalahti; Tapio Videman; Kim Burton; Jaakko Kaprio
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2007-11-29

9.  Bone mineral content, gender, body posture, and build in relation to back pain in middle age.

Authors:  H Bergenudd; B Nilsson; A Udén; S Willner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The influence of age and gender on lumbar spine sagittal plane range of motion. A study of 1126 healthy subjects.

Authors:  M S Sullivan; C E Dickinson; J D Troup
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Musculoskeletal risk factors as predictors of injury in community-dwelling women.

Authors:  Elaine Trudelle-Jackson; David Leonard; James R Morrow
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Age-related loss of lumbar spinal lordosis and mobility--a study of 323 asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Marcel Dreischarf; Laia Albiol; Antonius Rohlmann; Esther Pries; Maxim Bashkuev; Thomas Zander; Georg Duda; Claudia Druschel; Patrick Strube; Michael Putzier; Hendrik Schmidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Whole-body patterns of the range of joint motion in young adults: masculine type and feminine type.

Authors:  Keiichi Moromizato; Ryosuke Kimura; Hitoshi Fukase; Kyoko Yamaguchi; Hajime Ishida
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.867

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.