Literature DB >> 16047207

Three-dimensional relation of skin markers to lumbar vertebrae of healthy subjects in different postures measured by open MRI.

Falk Mörl1, Reinhard Blickhan.   

Abstract

The debate is to which extent external skin markers represent true underlying vertebral position and motion. Skin markers and lumbar vertebrae L3 and L4 were examined by vertically open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within different postures to investigate whether, and to which extent the position and orientation of skin markers represent the corresponding information of assigned underlying vertebra. Nine healthy volunteers sat within an open MRI scanner in five different seating postures: upright, low flexion, heavy flexion, upright left turn and upright right turn. Skin markers were fixed at lumbar levels L3 and L4. A set of landmarks defines corresponding positions on the vertebrae. Translation-vectors quantify the change of co-ordinates while changing position. Orientation (Cardan-angles) of each level in space was calculated from co-ordinates of three skin-markers and the corresponding vertebral landmarks respectively. The close relation between the position of the individual skin marker and its corresponding landmark on the vertebrae is conserved through all postures (regression coefficients: 0.720<b<0.972, 0.916<r<0.993, p<0.0001). Despite the high sensitivity to measurement errors there is a strong relation between the translation-vectors of external markers and the corresponding translation of the landmark on the vertebrae (0.68<r<0.99, p<0.0001). Within the resolution of the MR-imaging the orientation of the vertebrae can be predicted from the external markers (regression coefficients: 0.936<b<1.189, 0.769<r<0.959, p<0.0001). Positions and motions of skin markers can be taken as a first estimate to calculate the position and spatial orientation of underlying vertebrae. The use of skin markers may help to investigate spinal positions in daily life situations where internal imaging is not possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16047207      PMCID: PMC3489463          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0960-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

1.  Cineradiographic motion analysis of normal lumbar spine during forward and backward flexion.

Authors:  M Harada; K Abumi; M Ito; K Kaneda
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers.

Authors:  I Söderkvist; P A Wedin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Dynamic motion study of the whole lumbar spine by videofluoroscopy.

Authors:  A Okawa; K Shinomiya; H Komori; T Muneta; Y Arai; O Nakai
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Model-guided derivation of lumbar vertebral kinematics in vivo reveals the difference between external marker-defined and internal segmental rotations.

Authors:  Xudong Zhang; Jinjun Xiong
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  A new technique for measuring lumbar segmental motion in vivo. Method, accuracy, and preliminary results.

Authors:  T Steffen; R K Rubin; H G Baramki; J Antoniou; D Marchesi; M Aebi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Back surface curvature and measurement of lumbar spinal motion.

Authors:  I A Stokes; T M Bevins; R A Lunn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Stereo radiography of lumbar spine motion.

Authors:  M J Pearcy
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1985

8.  Influences of nonspecific low back pain on three-dimensional lumbar spine kinematics in locomotion.

Authors:  L Vogt; K Pfeifer; M Portscher And; W Banzer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Three-dimensional kinematics of the human back.

Authors:  R J Hindle; M J Pearcy; A T Cross; D H Miller
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Movements of the lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional X-ray analysis.

Authors:  M J Pearcy; M W Whittle
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1982-04
View more
  10 in total

1.  A new method for determining lumbar spine motion using Bayesian belief network.

Authors:  Heather Ting Ma; Zhengyi Yang; James F Griffith; Ping Chung Leung; Raymond Y W Lee
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  The quality of evidence of psychometric properties of three-dimensional spinal posture-measuring instruments.

Authors:  Yolandi Brink; Quinette Louw; Karen Grimmer-Somers
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Using Skin Markers for Spinal Curvature Quantification in Main Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Explorative Radiographic Study.

Authors:  Stefan Schmid; Daniel Studer; Carol-Claudius Hasler; Jacqueline Romkes; William R Taylor; Reinald Brunner; Silvio Lorenzetti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparison of spinal curvature parameters as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and the Cobb method in children with scoliosis.

Authors:  Mária Takács; Zsanett Orlovits; Bence Jáger; Rita M Kiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Spinal segments do not move together predictably during daily activities.

Authors:  Enrica Papi; Anthony M J Bull; Alison H McGregor
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Predicting spinal profile using 3D non-contact surface scanning: Changes in surface topography as a predictor of internal spinal alignment.

Authors:  J Paige Little; Lionel Rayward; Mark J Pearcy; Maree T Izatt; Daniel Green; Robert D Labrom; Geoffrey N Askin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Lumbar segment-dependent soft tissue artifacts of skin markers during in vivo weight-bearing forward-Backward bending.

Authors:  Xin Xi; Zhi Ling; Cong Wang; Chunya Gu; Xuqiang Zhan; Haixin Yu; Siqi Lu; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Yan Yu; Liming Cheng
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-17

8.  Soft tissue artefacts of the human back: comparison of the sagittal curvature of the spine measured using skin markers and an open upright MRI.

Authors:  Roland Zemp; Renate List; Turgut Gülay; Jean Pierre Elsig; Jaroslav Naxera; William R Taylor; Silvio Lorenzetti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Soft tissue artifact evaluation of the cervical spine in motion patterns of flexion and lateral bending: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Jiajia Wang; Zhongwen Lui; Zhihui Qian; Luquan Ren
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Spinal Motion and Muscle Activity during Active Trunk Movements - Comparing Sheep and Humans Adopting Upright and Quadrupedal Postures.

Authors:  Stephanie Valentin; Theresia F Licka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.