Literature DB >> 8573328

Medial olivocochlear system and loudness adaptation: differences between musicians and non-musicians.

C Micheyl1, O Carbonnel, L Collet.   

Abstract

Simple loudness adaptation and crossed olivocochlear feedback were investigated--through the Tone Decay Test (TDT) and Transiently Evoked Otoacoustic Emission (TEOAE) recording, respectively--in a sample of normal-hearing subjects including both musicians and non-musicians. The results for musicians and non-musicians differed statistically: the musicians showed on average less loudness adaptation and a greater reduction in TEOAE amplitude under contralateral acoustic stimulation, suggesting a stronger medial efferent feedback on the auditory periphery in these subjects. This finding, that not only psychoacoustic performance but also the physiological mechanism is different in musicians, strongly suggests that the latter should, like the former, be influenced by auditory "training" such as music studies. This perspective is discussed in detail in the text, since it raises puzzling questions and outlined promising issues in the field of auditory psychophysiology.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8573328     DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1995.1272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  11 in total

1.  Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians' perceptual advantages with pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  An active loudness model suggesting tinnitus as increased central noise and hyperacusis as increased nonlinear gain.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  [Hearing protectors in musicians].

Authors:  B Richter; M Zander; B Hohmann; C Spahn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structure.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

5.  Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Neural Encoding of Speech and Music: Implications for Hearing Speech in Noise.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2011-05-01

Review 7.  The nicotinic receptor of cochlear hair cells: a possible pharmacotherapeutic target?

Authors:  Ana Belén Elgoyhen; Eleonora Katz; Paul A Fuchs
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 8.  Effects of Non-traumatic Noise and Conductive Hearing Loss on Auditory System Function.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Micheal L Dent; Wei Sun; Matthew A Xu-Friedman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Assessment of rock musician's efferent system functioning using contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Prawin Kumar; Vibhu Grover; Sam Publius A; Himanshu Kumar Sanju; Sachchidanand Sinha
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-12-23

10.  Characteristic of Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions: Detection Rate, Musical Training Influence, and Gain Function.

Authors:  Yao Wang; Zhihang Qi; Mengmeng Yu; Jinhai Wang; Ruijuan Chen
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.