Literature DB >> 8572423

On the influence of volume currents and extended sources on neuromagnetic fields: a simulation study.

J Haueisen1, C Ramon, P Czapski, M Eiselt.   

Abstract

The influence of volume currents on the magnetic field is an important question in magnetoencephalography since the spherical volume conductor is still widely used for source localization. In theory, the magnetic field of a radial dipole in a homogeneous sphere is zero. In realistic models of the head, the field is suppressed when compared with a tangential dipole. To determine the influence of the volume currents, this suppression ratio (magnetic field of the radial dipole divided by the field of the tangential dipole) needs to be quantified. Large-scale finite element method models of the human head and the rabbit head were constructed and the suppression ratio was computed. The computed suppression value of 0.28 in the rabbit head was similar to the previously measured experimental value. In the human head, an average suppression ratio of 0.19 +/- 0.07 was found for different regions and depths in the gray matter. It was found that the computed magnetic field of radial sources varied significantly with the conductivities of the surrounding tissues where the dipole was located. We also modeled the magnetic field of an epileptic interictal spike in a finite element model of the rabbit head with a single dipole and with extended sources of varying length (1-8 mm). The extended source models developed were based on invasive measurements of an interictal spike within the rabbit brain. The field patterns of the small (1-2 mm) extended sources were similar to a single dipolar source and begin to deviate significantly from a dipolar field for the larger extended sources (6-8 mm).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8572423     DOI: 10.1007/bf02584472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  12 in total

1.  Resistivity of body tissues at low frequencies.

Authors:  S RUSH; J A ABILDSKOV
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 2.  Finite element analysis of bioelectric phenomena.

Authors:  C E Miller; C S Henriquez
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  1990

3.  Electrical properties of the epidermal stratum corneum.

Authors:  T Yamamoto; Y Yamamoto
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1976-03

4.  Dependence of the MEG on dipole orientation in the rabbit head.

Authors:  J R Melcher; D Cohen
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-11

5.  Effects of local variations in skull and scalp thickness on EEG's and MEG's.

Authors:  B N Cuffin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Method to reduce blur distortion from EEG's using a realistic head model.

Authors:  J Le; A Gevins
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Electrical and dielectric properties of wet bone as a function of frequency.

Authors:  G N Reddy; S Saha
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  The specific resistance of biological material--a compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist.

Authors:  L A Geddes; L E Baker
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1967-05

9.  MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain.

Authors:  D Cohen; B N Cuffin; K Yunokuchi; R Maniewski; C Purcell; G R Cosgrove; J Ives; J G Kennedy; D L Schomer
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Computational studies of transthoracic and transvenous defibrillation in a detailed 3-D human thorax model.

Authors:  D B Jorgenson; D R Haynor; G H Bardy; Y Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  17 in total

1.  Source cancellation profiles of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Andrei Irimia; John Darrell Van Horn; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation.

Authors:  Seppo P Ahlfors; Jooman Han; John W Belliveau; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Finite element analysis of a floating microstimulator.

Authors:  Mesut Sahin; Syed S Ur-Rahman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.

Authors:  Ming-Xiong Huang; Tao Song; Donald J Hagler; Igor Podgorny; Veikko Jousmaki; Li Cui; Kathleen Gaa; Deborah L Harrington; Anders M Dale; Roland R Lee; Jeff Elman; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Influence of skull anisotropy for the forward and inverse problem in EEG: simulation studies using FEM on realistic head models.

Authors:  G Marin; C Guerin; S Baillet; L Garnero; G Meunier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Feasibility of Neural Stimulation With Floating-Light-Activated Microelectrical Stimulators.

Authors:  Ammar Abdo; Mesut Sahin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.833

7.  Virtual labyrinth model of vestibular afferent excitation via implanted electrodes: validation and application to design of a multichannel vestibular prosthesis.

Authors:  Russell Hayden; Stacia Sawyer; Eric Frey; Susumu Mori; Americo A Migliaccio; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  In vitro testing of floating light activated micro-electrical stimulators.

Authors:  Ammar Abdo; Vianney Jayasinha; Philipp S Spuhler; M Unlu; Mesut Sahin
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

9.  The cortical site of visual suppression by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  A Thielscher; A Reichenbach; K Uğurbil; K Uludağ
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Influence of head models on neuromagnetic fields and inverse source localizations.

Authors:  Ceon Ramon; Jens Haueisen; Paul H Schimpf
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.