Literature DB >> 2460320

Dependence of the MEG on dipole orientation in the rabbit head.

J R Melcher1, D Cohen.   

Abstract

In theory, a radial current dipole in a conducting sphere produces zero magnetic field outside the sphere, while a tangential dipole produces a non-zero field. Because the heads of humans and some animals resemble a conducting sphere, it follows that the magnetic field due to a radial dipole in these heads should be suppressed compared to that due to a tangential dipole. This hypothesis, which is important in the interpretation of the MEG, has never been experimentally tested. We here present a test performed in the rabbit. First, a radial dipole was placed in the rabbit head, and the magnetic field over the head due to this source was measured. Then, a similar but tangential dipole was placed in the head and again the resulting magnetic field was measured. The two magnetic fields were then compared to determine the suppression of the field due to the radial dipole. This suppression was expressed as the ratio R, the magnetic field over the head due to the radial dipole divided by that for the tangential dipole. It was found that R = 0.17 +/- 0.07, or that the magnetic field due to a radial dipole is suppressed by a factor of about 6. Therefore, to first order, the hypothesis is supported for the rabbit head. From a comparison of rabbit and human head geometry, a similar degree of suppression could be expected in the human.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2460320     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90024-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  9 in total

1.  The topographic distribution of the magnetic P100M to full- and half-field stimulation.

Authors:  G Harding; B Janday; R Armstrong
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Source cancellation profiles of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Andrei Irimia; John Darrell Van Horn; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation.

Authors:  Seppo P Ahlfors; Jooman Han; John W Belliveau; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Topographic mapping and source localization of the pattern reversal visual evoked magnetic response.

Authors:  G F Harding; B Janday; R A Armstrong
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 5.  EEG versus MEG localization accuracy: theory and experiment.

Authors:  D Cohen; B N Cuffin
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.

Authors:  Daniel M Goldenholz; Seppo P Ahlfors; Matti S Hämäläinen; Dahlia Sharon; Mamiko Ishitobi; Lucia M Vaina; Steven M Stufflebeam
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  On the influence of volume currents and extended sources on neuromagnetic fields: a simulation study.

Authors:  J Haueisen; C Ramon; P Czapski; M Eiselt
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  A Novel Approach to Estimating the Cortical Sources of Sleep Spindles Using Simultaneous EEG/MEG.

Authors:  Dimitrios Mylonas; Martin Sjøgård; Zhaoyue Shi; Bryan Baxter; Matti Hämäläinen; Dara S Manoach; Sheraz Khan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Beamformer source analysis and connectivity on concurrent EEG and MEG data during voluntary movements.

Authors:  Muthuraman Muthuraman; Helge Hellriegel; Nienke Hoogenboom; Abdul Rauf Anwar; Kidist Gebremariam Mideksa; Holger Krause; Alfons Schnitzler; Günther Deuschl; Jan Raethjen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.