Literature DB >> 8571472

Comet assay reveals DNA strand breaks induced by ultrasonic cavitation in vitro.

D L Miller1, R M Thomas, R L Buschbom.   

Abstract

The induction of DNA strand breaks in cultured Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells was investigated in suspensions directly exposed to 2.17-MHz ultrasound. Production of hydrogen peroxide, a DNA-damaging sonochemical, by inertial cavitation was enhanced by the use of argon-and-oxygen-bubbled media and cell survival was improved by establishing standing waves and minimizing tube rotation. Viable cells were separated from the suspension after exposure and kept on ice for evaluation with the single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay. With this assay, DNA damage from as little as 2-mumol/L hydrogen peroxide treatment for 30 min could be detected, and cell survival as low as 2-5% after ultrasound exposure was adequate for assay. An ultrasound dose-response trend was noted for increasing pressure amplitude up to 0.82 MPa (free field) and increasing exposure duration up to 4 min. The cells were able to repair some of the strand breaks when warmed to 28 degrees C for 30 min. The effect was not eliminated by addition of catalase, which indicates that the DNA damage was not due to the action of residual H2O2 alone. The results confirm the hypothesis of DNA damage in cells surviving inertial cavitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8571472     DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(95)00017-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  14 in total

Review 1.  Section 8--clinical relevance. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  DNA damage induced by lithotripter generated shock waves: short report.

Authors:  A M Kochański; J P Mejnartowicz; A Latos-Bieleńska; J Etienne; L Filipczyńiski
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Stable and unstable chromosome aberrations measured after occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and ultrasound.

Authors:  Aleksandra Fucić; Davor Zeljezić; Vilena Kasuba; Nevenka Kopjar; Ruzica Rozgaj; Ruzica Lasan; August Mijić; Vlasta Hitrec; Joe Nathan Lucas
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 7.  Safety assurance in obstetrical ultrasound.

Authors:  Douglas L Miller
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.875

8.  Single-cell gel electrophoresis (SCG)-A review and discussion.

Authors:  Y Lu; T Takeshita; K Morimoto
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.674

9.  Pressure induced nucleus DNA fragmentation.

Authors:  Cezary Grygoruk; Piotr Sieczynski; Jacek A Modlinski; Barbara Gajda; Pawel Greda; Izabela Grad; Piotr Pietrewicz; Grzegorz Mrugacz
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  [Ultrasound contrast agents. Pharmaceutical drug safety and bioeffects].

Authors:  M Krix; J W Jenne
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.