Literature DB >> 8568036

Use of quantitative measures of auditory brain-stem response peak amplitude and residual background noise in the decision to stop averaging.

M Don1, C Elberling.   

Abstract

An objective quantitative approach to the decision of when to stop averaging sweeps in auditory brain-stem response (ABR) testing is presented. This decision is based on (1) the knowledge of the amplitude distributions of wave V in the ABRs of normal hearing individuals for varying stimulus levels, (2) calculated estimates of the residual background noise in the average, and (3) use of a quantitative statistical detector of an evoked potential. Several reasons for terminating an average are presented along with a specific protocol for each of the reasons. These protocols provide a general but consistent framework to address the issue of when to stop averaging and should improve the efficiency of ABR testing. Furthermore, it is quite possible to automate the procedure and the decision process.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8568036     DOI: 10.1121/1.414560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Determining the upper limits of stimulation for auditory steady-state response measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Brenda M Hoover; Darcia M Dierking; Kathryn L Beauchaine; Carol Manning
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Objective estimation of loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Estimating loudness growth from tone-burst evoked responses.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  BAEPs averaging analysis using autoregressive modelling.

Authors:  E Vannier; A Naït-Ali
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  [Audiometric thresholds estimated by auditory steady-state responses. Influence of EEG amplitude and test duration on accuracy].

Authors:  R Mühler; T Rahne
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Stimulus presentation strategies for eliciting the acoustic change complex: increasing efficiency.

Authors:  Brett A Martin; Arthur Boothroyd; Dassan Ali; Tiffany Leach-Berth
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 7.  [Objective diagnostic methods in pediatric audiology].

Authors:  R Mühler; S Hoth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Interaural stacked auditory brainstem response measures for detecting small unilateral acoustic tumors.

Authors:  Manuel Don; Betty Kwong; Chiemi Tanaka
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Air and Bone Conduction Click and Tone-Burst Auditory Brainstem Thresholds Using Kalman Adaptive Processing in Nonsedated Normal-Hearing Infants.

Authors:  Alaaeldin M Elsayed; Lisa L Hunter; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Jareen K Meinzen-Derr; Kelly Baroch; Maureen Sullivan-Mahoney; Kara Francis; Leigh G Schaid
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Objective threshold estimation and measurement of the residual background noise in auditory evoked potentials of goldfish.

Authors:  Jianqiang Xiao; Christopher B Braun
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.