Literature DB >> 8567421

Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and their anaesthesia sensitivity in the European starling and the chicken.

S Kettembeil1, G A Manley, E Siegl.   

Abstract

The aim of the present experimental series was to provide further information on the distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DP) of birds and contribute to a general understanding of DP generation. Basic characteristics of the DP 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 were measured in the ear canal of both awake and anaesthetized European Starlings and chickens. The effect of a third suppressive tone and the behaviour of the DP under anaesthesia were also studied. In general, the DP characteristics of both bird species resembled those of lizards and mammals, but first appeared at somewhat higher primary-tone levels. The best frequencies of third tones suppressing 2f1-f2 lay near the first primary tone (f1), but for 2f2-f1, the situation was more complex. Facilitation via a third tone was also seen for both DP, often at levels below those eliciting suppression. The DP 2f1-f2 disappeared completely at the onset of deep anaesthesia and recovered to its original magnitude when the anaesthesia was lightened, sometimes with a considerable delay. The compound action potential (CAP) was somewhat more sensitive to anaesthesia than the DP. Control experiments showed that the anaesthesia effect was not a result of hypoxia. Avian DP at low and intermediate sound levels are thus physiologically-sensitive manifestations of normal hair-cell function that are, in contrast to mammals, also anaesthesia-sensitive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8567421     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00053-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  12 in total

1.  A comparison of auditory brainstem responses across diving bird species.

Authors:  Sara E Crowell; Alicia M Wells-Berlin; Catherine E Carr; Glenn H Olsen; Ronald E Therrien; Sally E Yannuzzi; Darlene R Ketten
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Multifrequency forcing of a Hopf oscillator model of the inner ear.

Authors:  K A Montgomery
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  The effects of hypotensive anaesthesia on otoacoustic emissions: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study with objective outcome measures.

Authors:  Ibrahim Aladag; Ziya Kaya; Levent Gurbuzler; Ahmet Eyibilen; Murat Songu; Duzgun Ates; Unal Erkorkmaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Peripheral auditory processing changes seasonally in Gambel's white-crowned sparrow.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Eliot Brenowitz; Edwin W Rubel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  A prestin motor in chicken auditory hair cells: active force generation in a nonmammalian species.

Authors:  Maryline Beurg; Xiaodong Tan; Robert Fettiplace
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  Otoacoustic Emissions in Non-Mammals.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2022-05-11

7.  Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Dissociation between distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Michelle D Valero; Eila K Roberts; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Otoacoustic emissions in humans, birds, lizards, and frogs: evidence for multiple generation mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Dennis M Freeman; James C Saunders; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Effect of prenatal androgens on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in male and female sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Michelle D Valero; Eila K Roberts; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.587

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.