Literature DB >> 8564901

Appropriateness in health care delivery: definitions, measurement and policy implications.

J N Lavis1, G M Anderson.   

Abstract

A major focus of the current health care debate is the notion that a substantial proportion of the health care delivered in Canada is inappropriate. There are two types of appropriateness: appropriateness of a service and appropriateness of the setting in which care is provided (i.e., inpatient v. outpatient or home care). Measuring both types objectively requires the comparison of observed patterns of care with explicit criteria for appropriate care. The few studies of appropriateness conducted in Canada have shown that inappropriate services are provided and inappropriate settings are used. Reducing inappropriate health care delivery could involve active strategies for the implementation of guidelines and better cooperation and coordination within the health care system. However, lower rates of health care delivery or even inappropriate health care will not necessarily translate into higher quality care or lower costs overall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8564901      PMCID: PMC1487507     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  33 in total

1.  Does inappropriate use explain small-area variations in the use of health care services?

Authors:  L L Leape; R E Park; D H Solomon; M R Chassin; J Kosecoff; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Reliability and validity of utilization review criteria. Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol, Standardized Medreview Instrument, and Intensity-Severity-Discharge criteria.

Authors:  I Strumwasser; N V Paranjpe; D L Ronis; D Share; L J Sell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Reins or fences: a physician's view of cost containment.

Authors:  K Grumbach; T Bodenheimer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  The reliability and validity of the pediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol.

Authors:  K J Kemper; H D Fink; P L McCarthy
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1989-03

5.  The appropriateness of performing coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  C M Winslow; J B Kosecoff; M Chassin; D E Kanouse; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988 Jul 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Measuring the clinical appropriateness of the use of a procedure. Can we do it?

Authors:  K L Kahn; J Kosecoff; M R Chassin; M F Flynn; A Fink; N Pattaphongse; D H Solomon; R H Brook
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  The use and misuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  K L Kahn; J Kosecoff; M R Chassin; D H Solomon; R H Brook
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Diagnosis and treatment of coronary disease: comparison of doctors' attitudes in the USA and the UK.

Authors:  R H Brook; J B Kosecoff; R E Park; M R Chassin; C M Winslow; J R Hampton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-04-02       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Assessing the need to hospitalize children: pediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol.

Authors:  B E Kreger; J D Restuccia
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  D A Davis; M A Thomson; A D Oxman; R B Haynes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-09-02       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Conservative spine care: opportunities to improve the quality and value of care.

Authors:  Thomas M Kosloff; David Elton; Stephanie A Shulman; Janice L Clarke; Alexis Skoufalos; Amanda Solis
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Trends in hospital use for mechanical neck and back problems in Ontario and the United States: discretionary care in different health care systems.

Authors:  J N Lavis; A Malter; G M Anderson; V M Taylor; R A Deyo; C Bombardier; T Axcell; W Kreuter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-01-13       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Measuring the appropriateness of hospital use.

Authors:  D J Hunter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  The socioeconomic impact of insomnia. An overview.

Authors:  L A Chilcott; C M Shapiro
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Newfoundland and Labrador.

Authors:  G A Fox; J O'Dea; P S Parfrey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-05-05       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  [Management of osteoporosis in short-term geriatric units].

Authors:  Nathalie Champoux; Martine Lafleur; Benoît Bertrand; Suzanne Gilbert; Judith Latour; Marie Jeanne Kergoat
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  A Conceptual Framework for Appropriateness in Surgical Care: Reviewing Past Approaches and Looking Ahead to Patient-centered Shared Decision Making.

Authors:  Zara Cooper; Puneet Sayal; Sarah K Abbett; Mark D Neuman; Elizabeth M Rickerson; Angela M Bader
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Interpretations of referral appropriateness by senior health managers in five PCT areas in England: a qualitative investigation.

Authors:  N Blundell; Aileen Clarke; N Mays
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-06

Review 9.  The prevalence, cost implications, and management of sleep disorders: an overview.

Authors:  Jamil L Hossain; Colin M Shapiro
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 10.  Enhancing continuity of information: essential components of consultation reports.

Authors:  Whitney Berta; Jan Barnsley; Jeff Bloom; Rhonda Cockerill; Dave Davis; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Anne Marie Mior; Yves Talbot; Eugene Vayda
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.