Literature DB >> 2968469

The appropriateness of performing coronary artery bypass surgery.

C M Winslow1, J B Kosecoff, M Chassin, D E Kanouse, R H Brook.   

Abstract

Information about how appropriately procedures are performed is vital to the understanding of the impact of technology and to the success of efforts to channel its use appropriately. While the efficacy of coronary artery bypass surgery has been addressed in several large-scale, randomized trials, there is little information about how appropriately the procedure is actually being used in the community. We determined the appropriateness of coronary artery bypass surgeries performed in three randomly chosen hospitals in a western state. We determined appropriateness by comparing data obtained from a detailed medical record review with a list of 488 indications. This list, developed by a national panel of physicians, covered all possible reasons for performing the procedure. Three hundred eighty-six cases from the years 1979, 1980, and 1982 were examined. Fifty-six percent of the surgeries were performed for appropriate reasons, 30% for equivocal reasons, and 14% for inappropriate reasons. The percentage of appropriate surgeries varied by hospital, from 37% to 78%, but did not vary by patient age. Eliminating the performance of inappropriate procedures may lead to reductions in health care expenditures or to improved patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2968469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  34 in total

1.  Racial disparities in access to renal transplantation--clinically appropriate or due to underuse or overuse?

Authors:  A M Epstein; J Z Ayanian; J H Keogh; S J Noonan; N Armistead; P D Cleary; J S Weissman; J A David-Kasdan; D Carlson; J Fuller; D Marsh; R M Conti
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Racial and ethnic differences in the use of cardiovascular procedures: findings from the California Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.

Authors:  E Ford; J Newman; K Deosaransingh
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J M Quintana; J Cabriada; I López de Tejada; M Varona; V Oribe; B Barrios; I Aróstegui; A Bilbao
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

4.  Health resources management and physician control in a San Francisco, California, hospital.

Authors:  A H Rosenstein; M M Stier
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-02

Review 5.  Unnecessary surgery.

Authors:  L L Leape
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  What can Europeans learn from Americans?

Authors:  A C Enthoven
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1989-12

7.  Quality of care indicators for the rehabilitation of children with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Frederick P Rivara; Stephanie K Ennis; Rita Mangione-Smith; Ellen J MacKenzie; Kenneth M Jaffe
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  How good is the quality of health care in the United States? 1998.

Authors:  Mark A Schuster; Elizabeth A McGlynn; Robert H Brook
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 9.  Cost-benefit considerations in the treatment of elderly people.

Authors:  B Livesley
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Coronary artery bypass grafting in Canada: What is its rate of use? Which rate is right?

Authors:  C D Naylor; A M Ugnat; D Weinkauf; G M Anderson; A Wielgosz
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.