Literature DB >> 1501333

Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials.

D A Davis1, M A Thomson, A D Oxman, R B Haynes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of diverse continuing medical education (CME) interventions on physician performance and health care outcomes. DATA SOURCES: Using continuing medical education and related phrases, we performed regular searches of the indexed literature (MEDLINE, Social Science Index, the National Technical Information Service, and Educational Research Information Clearinghouse) from 1975 through 1991. In addition, for these years, we used manual searches, key informants, and requests to authors to locate other indexed articles and the nonindexed literature of adult and continuing professional education. STUDY SELECTION: From the resulting database we selected studies that met the following criteria: randomized controlled trials; educational programs, activities, or other interventions; studies that included 50% or more physicians; follow-up assessments of at least 75% of study subjects; and objective assessments of either physician performance or health care outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were reviewed for data related to physician specialty and setting. Continuing medical education interventions were classified by their mode(s) of activity as being predisposing, enabling, or facilitating. Using the statistical tests supplied by the original investigators, physician performance outcomes and patient outcomes were classified as positive, negative, or inconclusive. DATA SYNTHESIS: We located 777 CME studies, of which 50 met all criteria. Thirty-two of these analyzed physician performance; seven evaluated patient outcomes; 11 examined both measures. The majority of the 43 studies of physician performance showed positive results in some important measures of resource utilization, counseling strategies, and preventive medicine. Of the 18 studies of health care outcomes, eight demonstrated positive changes in patients' health care outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Broadly defined CME interventions using practice-enabling or reinforcing strategies consistently improve physician performance and, in some instances, health care outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1501333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  203 in total

1.  Small-group CME using e-mail discussions. Can it work?

Authors:  J N Marshall; M Stewart; T Ostbye
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Changing doctor prescribing behaviour.

Authors:  P S Gill; M Mäkelä; K M Vermeulen; N Freemantle; G Ryan; C Bond; T Thorsen; F M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-08

3.  Developing learning organisations in the new NHS.

Authors:  H T Davies; S M Nutley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-08

4.  Pilot study for appropriate anti-infective community therapy. Effect of a guideline-based strategy to optimize use of antibiotics.

Authors:  J Stewart; J Pilla; L Dunn
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  'Practice professional development plans': general practitioners' perspectives on proposed changes in general practice education.

Authors:  J Pitts; A Curtis; R While; I Holloway
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Recommendations for future studies: a systematic review of educational interventions in primary care settings.

Authors:  U Freudenstein; A Howe
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  A framework for effective management of change in clinical practice: dissemination and implementation of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  N T Moulding; C A Silagy; D P Weller
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-09

Review 8.  Management of chronic disease by practitioners and patients: are we teaching the wrong things?

Authors:  N M Clark; M Gong
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-26

9.  General practitioners' views on genetic screening for common diseases.

Authors:  M A Suchard; P Yudkin; J S Sinsheimer; G H Fowler
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 10.  Interventions to improve the delivery of preventive services in primary care.

Authors:  M E Hulscher; M Wensing; R P Grol; T van der Weijden; C van Weel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.