Literature DB >> 8561140

Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction.

J F Johanson1, J Lafferty.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Fecal incontinence represents an embarrassing social problem, the magnitude of which remains largely unknown. The present study prospectively examined the prevalence and demographic distributions of fecal incontinence.
METHODS: demographic data, in addition to information regarding the reason for visit, bowel habits, and the frequency, type, and severity of fecal incontinence, were collected from individuals at the time of visits to their primary care physician or gastroenterologist.
RESULTS: Eight hundred and eighty-one individuals 18 yr or older were included in the analysis. The overall prevalence of fecal incontinence was 18.4%. When stratified by frequency, 2.7, 4.5, and 7.1% of participants admitted to incontinence daily, weekly, or once per month or less, respectively. Incontinence increased progressively with age and was 1.3 times more common in males than females. Only one-third of individuals with fecal incontinence had ever discussed the problem with a physician.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of fecal incontinence appears to be more common than previously appreciated. Moreover, only a minority with a physician. It would seem important to more actively pursue this "silent affliction" particularly in patients who do not readily volunteer this information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8561140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  114 in total

1.  Meta-analysis: sacral nerve stimulation versus conservative therapy in the treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Emile Tan; Nye-Thane Ngo; Ara Darzi; Michael Shenouda; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Idiopathic Constipation and Fecal Incontinence.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-12

Review 3.  Novel surgical approaches to fecal incontinence: neurostimulation and artificial anal sphincter.

Authors:  Xiaotuan Zhao; Pankaj J Pasricha
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-10

4.  Goals of fecal incontinence management identified by community-living incontinent adults.

Authors:  Amanda Manthey; Donna Z Bliss; Kay Savik; Ann Lowry; Robin Whitebird
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Reasons for non-disclosure of faecal incontinence: a comparison between two survey methods.

Authors:  L Bartlett; M Nowak; Y H Ho
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  The association between fecal incontinence and sexual activity and function in women attending a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Sara B Cichowski; Yuko M Komesu; Gena C Dunivan; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Anal incontinence-sphincter ani repair: indications, techniques, outcome.

Authors:  Susan Galandiuk; Leslie A Roth; Quincy J Greene
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Evaluation of anal incontinence: minimal approach, maximal effectiveness.

Authors:  Harry T Papaconstantinou
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02

9.  Anal physiology testing in fecal incontinence: is it of any value?

Authors:  Massarat Zutshi; Levilester Salcedo; Jeffrey Hammel; Tracy Hull
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Pelvic floor consequences of cesarean delivery on maternal request in women with a single birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Julie S Ivy; Divya A Patel; Sejal N Patel; Dean G Smith; Scott B Ransom; Dee Fenner; John O L Delancey
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.