Literature DB >> 19902225

Anal physiology testing in fecal incontinence: is it of any value?

Massarat Zutshi1, Levilester Salcedo, Jeffrey Hammel, Tracy Hull.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The prognostic value of postoperative manometry in fecal incontinence is still controversial. The aims of this study were to establish if Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL) scores correlate with anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound findings and to define if there is any prognostic value in performing anal manometry after patients are surgically treated for fecal incontinence.
METHODS: Fifty-three patients, all women, were identified. All patients underwent a surgical procedure and were analyzed pre- and postoperatively. Fecal incontinence was assessed using the FISI and FIQL. Patients who did not have these score were excluded. Manometry and ultrasound findings before treatment and manometry findings after treatment were compared with surgical patient's incontinence scores. Anal canal length was noted, and its association with the pre- and postoperative manometry finding and incontinence scores were compared.
RESULTS: No correlation of pre- and postoperative resting and squeeze pressures with incontinence scores was found. Ultrasound findings had no correlation with manometry results and incontinence scores. Anal canal length correlated with both pre- and postoperative manometry findings but not with incontinence scores.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound help in guiding treatment options in patients with fecal incontinence. A decrease in FISI and increase in FIQL scores after a sphincter repair quantifies improvement after incontinence surgery, while changes in anal manometry pressures readings do not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19902225     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0830-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  47 in total

1.  Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Fecal incontinence in females with a past history of vaginal delivery: significance of anal sphincter defects detected by ultrasound.

Authors:  Henri Damon; Luc Henry; Xavier Barth; François Mion
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Fecal incontinence in scleroderma. Clinical features, anorectal manometric findings, and their therapeutic implications.

Authors:  B W Jaffin; P Chang; H Spiera
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  Anal manometric parameters: predictors of outcome following anal sphincter repair?

Authors:  Susan Gearhart; Tracy Hull; Crina Floruta; Tom Schroeder; Jeff Hammel
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Accuracy and reliability of transanal ultrasound for anterior anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  S M Sentovich; W D Wong; G J Blatchford
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Comparison of vector symmetry index and endoanal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of anal sphincter disruption.

Authors:  D N Samarasekera; Y Wright; R H Lowndes; K P Stanley; P Preston; C T M Speakman
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 8.  Faecal incontinence in adults.

Authors:  Robert D Madoff; Susan C Parker; Madhulika G Varma; Ann C Lowry
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Aug 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A prospective study of anal sphincter injury due to childbirth.

Authors:  N Rieger; A Schloithe; G Saccone; D Wattchow
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Comparison of ultrasound and manometric sphincter length and incontinence scores.

Authors:  A L Fowler; A Mills; J Virjee; M Callaway; P Durdey; M G Thomas
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  18 in total

1.  Fecal incontinence: etiology, evaluation, and treatment.

Authors:  Dana M Hayden; Eric G Weiss
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-03

Review 2.  Diagnostic testing for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Craig H Olson
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-09

Review 3.  [Anorectal diagnostics for proctological diseases].

Authors:  T Jackisch; H Witzigmann; S Stelzner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  [Treatment of sphincter insufficiency].

Authors:  K E Matzel; B Bittorf
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Relationships between the results of anorectal investigations and symptom severity in patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  P T Heitmann; P Rabbitt; A Schloithe; V Patton; P P Skuza; D A Wattchow; P G Dinning
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Validation of the Wexner scale in women with fecal incontinence in a Turkish population.

Authors:  Cetin Cam; Selcuk Selcuk; Mehmet Resit Asoglu; Niyazi Tug; Yesim Akdemir; Pınar Ay; Ates Karateke
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Fecal incontinence - Challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Nallely Saldana Ruiz; Andreas M Kaiser
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Fecal incontinence: the role of the urologist.

Authors:  C A Unger; H B Goldman; J E Jelovsek
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Steven D Wexner; Carolynne J Vaizey; Célia Gouynou; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  Pudendal nerve testing does not contribute to surgical decision making following anorectal testing in patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Edward A Cooper; Katie J De-Loyde; Christopher J Young; Heather L Shepherd; Caroline Wright
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.