Literature DB >> 20011334

Evaluation of anal incontinence: minimal approach, maximal effectiveness.

Harry T Papaconstantinou1.   

Abstract

Anal incontinence is a symptom represented by the impaired ability to control the elimination of gas and stool, with an estimated incidence of 2.2 to 7.1% of the population. These numbers likely under-represent the true prevalence because physicians and patients are reluctant to discuss this problem. Evaluation of the patient with anal incontinence requires a fundamental knowledge of the etiologic factors. Careful history and physical examination is essential in every patient and can identify the cause of most cases of incontinence. Incontinence scoring systems are tools that provide objective data regarding the severity and quality of anal incontinence. Supplemental special tests for evaluating incontinence should be aimed at achieving three goals: (1) provide additional and confirmatory information regarding the diagnosis and cause of incontinence; (2) select appropriate treatment; and (3) predict treatment outcome. Numerous studies to evaluate anal incontinence exist; however, the most useful tests to achieve these goals are anal manometry, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, and anal endosonography, because these studies can identify physiologic, neurologic, and anatomic abnormalities of the anorectum for which there may be effective treatments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anal; evaluation; fecal; incontinence

Year:  2005        PMID: 20011334      PMCID: PMC2780134          DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-864076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg        ISSN: 1530-9681


  53 in total

Review 1.  Endorectal ultrasound.

Authors:  T J Saclarides
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Transanal ultrasound and anorectal physiology findings affecting continence after sphincteroplasty.

Authors:  C A Ternent; M Shashidharan; G J Blatchford; M A Christensen; A G Thorson; S M Sentovich
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 3.  Current techniques of assessing defecation dynamics.

Authors:  S S Rao; W M Sun
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.404

4.  Effect of radiotherapy on anorectal function in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  T Iwamoto; S Nakahara; R Mibu; M Hotokezaka; H Nakano; M Tanaka
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Anal sphincter repair improves anorectal function and endosonographic image. A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  R J Felt-Bersma; M A Cuesta; M Koorevaar
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Are special investigations of value in the management of patients with fecal incontinence?

Authors:  J P Keating; P J Stewart; A A Eyers; D Warner; E L Bokey
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Comparison of anal sonography with conventional needle electromyography in the evaluation of anal sphincter defects.

Authors:  P Enck; H J von Giesen; A Schäfer; T Heyer; B Gantke; S Flesch; G Arendt; N Schmitz; T Frieling
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Accuracy and reliability of transanal ultrasound for anterior anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  S M Sentovich; W D Wong; G J Blatchford
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Unilateral pudendal neuropathy. Impact on outcome of anal sphincter repair.

Authors:  Y P Sangwan; J A Coller; R C Barrett; P L Roberts; J J Murray; L Rusin; D J Schoetz
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Audit of sphincter repair. Factors associated with poor outcome.

Authors:  N Nikiteas; S Korsgen; D Kumar; M R Keighley
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Establishing a peripartum perineal trauma clinic: a narrative review.

Authors:  Aurore Fehlmann; Barbara Reichetzer; Stéphane Ouellet; Catherine Tremblay; Marie-Eve Clermont
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Survey of anal sphincter dysfunction using anal manometry in patients with fecal incontinence: a possible guide to therapy.

Authors:  Rohan Mandaliya; Anthony J DiMarino; Stephanie Moleski; Satish Rattan; Sidney Cohen
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

Review 3.  Bowel management for the treatment of pediatric fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Andrea Bischoff; Marc A Levitt; Alberto Peña
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 1.827

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.