Literature DB >> 20088671

Pelvic floor consequences of cesarean delivery on maternal request in women with a single birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Xiao Xu1, Julie S Ivy, Divya A Patel, Sejal N Patel, Dean G Smith, Scott B Ransom, Dee Fenner, John O L Delancey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The potential benefit in preventing pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) is a frequently cited reason for requesting or performing cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR). However, for primigravid women without medical/obstetric indications, the lifetime cost-effectiveness of CDMR remains unknown, particularly with regard to lifelong pelvic floor consequences. Our objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of CDMR in comparison to trial of labor (TOL) for primigravid women without medical/obstetric indications with a single childbirth over their lifetime, while explicitly accounting for the management of PFD throughout the lifetime.
METHODS: We used Monte Carlo simulation of a decision model containing 249 chance events and 101 parameters depicting lifelong maternal and neonatal outcomes in the following domains: actual mode of delivery, emergency hysterectomy, transient maternal morbidity and mortality, perinatal morbidity and mortality, and the lifelong management of PFDs. Parameter estimates were obtained from published literature. The analysis was conducted from a societal perspective. All costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted to the present value at childbirth.
RESULTS: The estimated mean cost and QALYs were $14,259 (95% confidence interval [CI] $8,964-$24,002) and 58.21 (95% CI 57.43-58.67) for CDMR and $13,283 (95% CI $7,861-$23,829) and 57.87 (95% CI 56.97-58.46) for TOL over the combined lifetime of the mother and the child. Parameters related to PFDs play an important role in determining cost and quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: When a woman without medical/obstetric indications has only one childbirth in her lifetime, cost-effectiveness analysis does not reveal a clearly preferable mode of delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20088671      PMCID: PMC2828240          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  116 in total

1.  Relative risk of postpartum complications in the Ohio Medicaid population: vaginal versus cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.929

2.  Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a comparison of cesarean and postpartum hysterectomy.

Authors:  Fatu Forna; Annette M Miles; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Long-term results of anterior sphincteroplasty.

Authors:  Alberto Bravo Gutierrez; Robert D Madoff; Ann C Lowry; Susan Congilosi Parker; W Donald Buie; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Cost-effectiveness analyses in gynecologic oncology: methodological quality and trends.

Authors:  Michael R Manuel; Lee-May Chen; Aaron B Caughey; Leslee L Subak
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Patient choice cesarean: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Joseph R Wax; Angelina Cartin; Michael G Pinette; Jacquelyn Blackstone
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.347

6.  Neonatal respiratory morbidity risk and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean delivery.

Authors:  V Zanardo; A K Simbi; M Franzoi; G Soldà; A Salvadori; D Trevisanuto
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.299

7.  Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes: population based retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Kitaw Demissie; George G Rhoads; John C Smulian; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Kishor Gandhi; K S Joseph; Michael Kramer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-03

8.  Cesarean delivery rates and neonatal morbidity in a low-risk population.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Gould; Beate Danielsen; Lisa M Korst; Roderic Phibbs; Kathy Chance; Elliott Main; David D Wirtschafter; David K Stevenson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Lara J Burrows; Leslie A Meyn; Anne M Weber
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Healthcare utilization among women who undergo surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Kraig S Kinchen; Stacey Long; Lucinda Orsini; William Crown; Richard C Bump
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-01-31
View more
  8 in total

1.  Vaginal birth and pelvic floor dysfunction revisited: Can cesarean delivery be protective?

Authors:  Maurizio Serati; Diaa Rizk; Stefano Salvatore
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Decision-making process for choosing an elective cesarean delivery among primiparas in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shiou-Yun Huang; Shuh-Jen Sheu; Chen-Jei Tai; Ching-Ping Chiang; Li-Yin Chien
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-07

3.  Percutaneous breast biopsy: effect on short-term quality of life.

Authors:  Kathryn L Humphrey; Janie M Lee; Karen Donelan; Chung Y Kong; Olubunmi Williams; Omosalewa Itauma; Elkan F Halpern; Beverly J Gerade; Elizabeth A Rafferty; J Shannon Swan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Cost-Effectiveness of Immediate Compared With Delayed Postpartum Etonogestrel Implant Insertion.

Authors:  Aileen M Gariepy; Jennifer Y Duffy; Xiao Xu
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Intraoperative Cell Salvage for Obstetric Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Grace Lim; Vladyslav Melnyk; Francesca L Facco; Jonathan H Waters; Kenneth J Smith
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Cost-effectiveness of Surgical Treatment Pathways for Prolapse.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Michele R Hacker; Monica Richardson
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  Maternal Choice in the UK Should Be Promoted Despite the Current Era of Financial Austerity.

Authors:  Samuel G Oxley; Eric Edison
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2012-11-20

8.  A descriptive analysis of the indications for caesarean section in mainland China.

Authors:  Yajun Liu; Guanghui Li; Yi Chen; Xin Wang; Yan Ruan; Liying Zou; Weiyuan Zhang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.