Literature DB >> 8553229

Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. The learning curve.

J D Wishner1, J W Baker, G C Hoffman, G W Hubbard, R J Gould, S D Wohlgemuth, W K Ruffin, C F Melick.   

Abstract

One hundred fifty consecutive laparoscopic-assisted colectomies performed by a surgical team were analyzed in an attempt to define a learning curve. These colectomies performed by the Norfolk Surgical Group over a 24-month period, were divided chronologically into six groups of 25 patients each. The groups were then compared to determine if any improvement in length of procedure, complication rate, conversion rate, or length of stay developed as experience increased. Colon cancer and diverticular disease were the most common indications for surgery in all groups. Right hemicolectomy, left colectomy, and low anterior resection accounted for the majority of procedures in all groups. A significant decrease in mean operative time, from 250 min to 156 min over the first 35-50 cases was observed before leveling off at approximately 140 min for the remaining group. Intraoperative complications were low in all groups (range zero to two) and did not show any trend. There was no statistically significant difference in the conversion rate (23.3% overall) among the six groups. Length of stay decreased from 6 days in the first two groups to 5 days in the last four groups, although the difference was not statistically significant. The learning curve for laparoscopic-assisted colectomies is longer than appreciated by many surgeons, requiring as many as 35-50 procedures to decrease operative time to baseline. Complications can be kept at an acceptably low level while on the curve if a cautious approach is taken and the surgeon realizes that a prolonged operative time is not only acceptable, but appropriate during this long learning process. A conversion rate of 20-25% at any phase of the learning process may in fact represent a limitation of current technology. When combined with a low complication rate it may be the sign of a careful surgeon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8553229     DOI: 10.1007/bf00210923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  4 in total

1.  Sequential psychomotor skills development in laparoscopic colon surgery.

Authors:  W P Geis; A V Coletta; J C Verdeja; G Plasencia; O Ojogho; M Jacobs
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1994-02

2.  Laparoscopic assisted colorectal surgery.

Authors:  I Puente; J L Sosa; D Sleeman; U Desai; N Tranakas; R Hartmann
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1994-02

3.  Laparoscopic colectomy: at what cost?

Authors:  D J Musser; R C Boorse; F Madera; J F Reed
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1994-02

4.  Prospective analysis of 40 initial laparoscopic colorectal resections: a plea for a randomized trial.

Authors:  K Slim; D Pezet; J Stencl; K Lagha; S Le Roux; C Lechner; J Chipponi
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1994-08
  4 in total
  56 in total

Review 1.  Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery.

Authors:  D A Rogers; A S Elstein; G Bordage
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Current status of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  F Köckerling; H Scheidbach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: is there a learning curve?

Authors:  K Shapiro; S Patel; Z Abdo; G Ferzli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Institution learning curve of laparoscopic colectomy--a multi-dimensional analysis.

Authors:  Jimmy C M Li; Anthony W I Lo; Sophie S F Hon; Simon S M Ng; Janet F Y Lee; Ka Lau Leung
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A prospective study demonstrating the reliability and validity of two procedure-specific evaluation tools to assess operative competence in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic management of diverticular disease.

Authors:  Jeremy M Lipman; Harry L Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-08

7.  Does the learning curve during laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect costs?

Authors:  Ravi P Kiran; Hasan T Kirat; Ersin Ozturk; Daniel P Geisler; Feza H Remzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Learning curve for standardized laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer under supervision: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masashi Ueno; Masatoshi Oya; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Adoption of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: It Was Quite a Journey.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

10.  Predicting conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Fellowship training may be an advantage.

Authors:  C M Schlachta; J Mamazza; R Grégoire; S E Burpee; K T Pace; E C Poulin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.