Literature DB >> 8167856

Laparoscopic colectomy: at what cost?

D J Musser1, R C Boorse, F Madera, J F Reed.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare laparoscopic to open colectomy with respect to: 1) morbidity and mortality, 2) adequacy of resection for cancer (margins and number of nodes), 3) operative time, 4) postoperative time for tolerating diet and discharge, and 5) total hospital charges. A historical control group of open colon surgery patients was used. Laparoscopic colectomy was completed in 18/24 patients and 6 were converted to open colectomy. There were no operative or perioperative mortalities. In procedures for cancer, all margins were free of tumor. The average number of nodes in the laparoscopic group (LC) was higher than in open colectomy (OC) group. The average operative time was slightly longer in the LC group compared to the OC group. Postoperative length of stay was shorter in the LC group, and considerably shorter in the elective LC group. Corrected average total hospital cost was lower in the LC group than in the OC group. Laparoscopic colectomy has acceptable morbidity and mortality, is cost-efficient and seems to provide adequate resection for cancer, although long-term data will be crucial to this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8167856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc        ISSN: 1051-7200


  14 in total

Review 1.  Adoption of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: It Was Quite a Journey.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

2.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis of 140 cases.

Authors:  S D Wexner; P Reissman; J Pfeifer; M Bernstein; N Geron
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Cost of open versus laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for cancer.

Authors:  B M Philipson; E L Bokey; J W Moore; P H Chapuis; E Bagge
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal malignancies: a systematic review.

Authors:  A E Chapman; M D Levitt; P Hewett; R Woods; H Sheiner; G J Maddern
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Economic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in Korea.

Authors:  Yoo Shin Choi; Sang-Il Lee; Taek-Gu Lee; Sung-Wook Kim; Guineum Cheon; Sung-Bum Kang
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. The learning curve.

Authors:  J D Wishner; J W Baker; G C Hoffman; G W Hubbard; R J Gould; S D Wohlgemuth; W K Ruffin; C F Melick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic colorectal resection. A multicenter Italian study.

Authors:  C Huscher; G Silecchia; E Croce; G A Farello; E Lezoche; M Morino; M Azzola; F Feliciotti; P Rosato; M Tarantini; N Basso
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Could laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery become the standard of care? A review and experience with 750 procedures.

Authors:  Christopher M Schlachta; Joseph Mamazza; Roger Gregoire; Stephen E Burpee; Eric C Poulin
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 9.  Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  R Veldkamp; M Gholghesaei; H J Bonjer; D W Meijer; M Buunen; J Jeekel; B Anderberg; M A Cuesta; A Cuschierl; A Fingerhut; J W Fleshman; P J Guillou; E Haglind; J Himpens; C A Jacobi; J J Jakimowicz; F Koeckerling; A M Lacy; E Lezoche; J R Monson; M Morino; E Neugebauer; S D Wexner; R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Is early oral feeding safe after elective colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  P Reissman; T A Teoh; S M Cohen; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.