Literature DB >> 8551981

Analysis of spiculation in the computerized classification of mammographic masses.

Z Huo1, M L Giger, C J Vyborny, U Bick, P Lu, D E Wolverton, R A Schmidt.   

Abstract

Spiculation is a primary sign of malignancy for masses detected by mammography. In this study, we developed a technique that analyzes patterns and quantifies the degree of spiculation present. Our current approach involves (1) automatic lesion extraction using region growing and (2) feature extraction using radial edge-gradient analysis. Two spiculation measures are obtained from an analysis of radial edge gradients. These measures are evaluated in four different neighborhoods about the extracted mammographic mass. The performance of each of the two measures of spiculation was tested on a database of 95 mammographic masses using ROC analysis that evaluates their individual ability to determine the likelihood of malignancy of a mass. The dependence of the performance of these measures on the choice of neighborhood was analyzed. We have found that it is only necessary to accurately extract an approximate outline of a mass lesion for the purposes of this analysis since the choice of a neighborhood that accommodates the thin spicules at the margin allows for the assessment of margin spiculation with the radial edge-gradient analysis technique. The two measures performed at their highest level when the surrounding periphery of the extracted region is used for feature extraction, yielding Az values of 0.83 and 0.85, respectively, for the determination of malignancy. These are similar to that achieved when a radiologist's ratings of spiculation (Az = 0.85) are used alone. The maximum value of one of the two spiculation measures (FWHM) from the four neighborhoods yielded an Az of 0.88 in the classification of mammographic mass lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8551981     DOI: 10.1118/1.597626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  24 in total

1.  Boundary modelling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses.

Authors:  R M Rangayyan; N R Mudigonda; J E Desautels
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Association of ultrasonographic features with NGX6 expression and prognosis in invasive ductal breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Jidong Xiao; Yuanquan Zhou; Wenhui Zhu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-06-01

3.  Exploring nonlinear feature space dimension reduction and data representation in breast Cadx with Laplacian eigenmaps and t-SNE.

Authors:  Andrew R Jamieson; Maryellen L Giger; Karen Drukker; Hui Li; Yading Yuan; Neha Bhooshan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Characterization of mammographic masses based on level set segmentation with new image features and patient information.

Authors:  Jiazheng Shi; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Ge; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Alexis Nees; Yi-Ta Wu; Jun Wei; Chuan Zhou; Yiheng Zhang; Jing Cui
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Correlative feature analysis on FFDM.

Authors:  Yading Yuan; Maryellen L Giger; Hui Li; Charlene Sennett
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Voice-activated retrieval of mammography reference images.

Authors:  H A Swett; P G Mutalik; V P Neklesa; L Horvath; C Lee; J Richter; I Tocino; P R Fisher
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Computerized determination scheme for histological classification of breast mass using objective features corresponding to clinicians' subjective impressions on ultrasonographic images.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Hizukuri; Ryohei Nakayama; Yumi Kashikura; Haruhiko Takase; Hiroharu Kawanaka; Tomoko Ogawa; Shinji Tsuruoka
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Prevalence scaling: applications to an intelligent workstation for the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Karla Horsch; Maryellen L Giger; Charles E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis on a large clinical full-field digital mammographic dataset.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Yading Yuan; Weijie Chen; Karla Horsch; Li Lan; Andrew R Jamieson; Charlene A Sennett; Sanaz A Jansen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.