Literature DB >> 19175108

Correlative feature analysis on FFDM.

Yading Yuan1, Maryellen L Giger, Hui Li, Charlene Sennett.   

Abstract

Identifying the corresponding images of a lesion in different views is an essential step in improving the diagnostic ability of both radiologists and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems. Because of the nonrigidity of the breasts and the 2D projective property of mammograms, this task is not trivial. In this pilot study, we present a computerized framework that differentiates between corresponding images of the same lesion in different views and noncorresponding images, i.e., images of different lesions. A dual-stage segmentation method, which employs an initial radial gradient index (RGI) based segmentation and an active contour model, is applied to extract mass lesions from the surrounding parenchyma. Then various lesion features are automatically extracted from each of the two views of each lesion to quantify the characteristics of density, size, texture and the neighborhood of the lesion, as well as its distance to the nipple. A two-step scheme is employed to estimate the probability that the two lesion images from different mammographic views are of the same physical lesion. In the first step, a correspondence metric for each pairwise feature is estimated by a Bayesian artificial neural network (BANN). Then, these pairwise correspondence metrics are combined using another BANN to yield an overall probability of correspondence. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the performance of the individual features and the selected feature subset in the task of distinguishing corresponding pairs from noncorresponding pairs. Using a FFDM database with 123 corresponding image pairs and 82 noncorresponding pairs, the distance feature yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.81 +/- 0.02 with leave-one-out (by physical lesion) evaluation, and the feature metric subset, which included distance, gradient texture, and ROI-based correlation, yielded an AUC of 0.87 +/- 0.02. The improvement by using multiple feature metrics was statistically significant compared to single feature performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19175108      PMCID: PMC2736721          DOI: 10.1118/1.3005641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  26 in total

1.  Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Z Huo; M L Giger; C J Vyborny
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Ideal observer approximation using Bayesian classification neural networks.

Authors:  M A Kupinski; D C Edwards; M L Giger; C E Metz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  An ROC comparison of four methods of combining information from multiple images of the same patient.

Authors:  Bei Liu; Charles E Metz; Yulei Jiang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Joseph K Leader; Gordon S Abrams; Amy H Lu; Luisa P Wallace; Glenn S Maitz; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method.

Authors:  Saskia van Engeland; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Weijie Chen; Maryellen L Giger; Hui Li; Ulrich Bick; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Automated computerized classification of malignant and benign masses on digitized mammograms.

Authors:  Z Huo; M L Giger; C J Vyborny; D E Wolverton; R A Schmidt; K Doi
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Statistical comparison of two ROC-curve estimates obtained from partially-paired datasets.

Authors:  C E Metz; B A Herman; C A Roe
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1998 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  F Maes; A Collignon; D Vandermeulen; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Correspondence in texture features between two mammographic views.

Authors:  Shalini Gupta; Mia K Markey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  6 in total

1.  Reduction of false-positive recalls using a computerized mammographic image feature analysis scheme.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Yuanjie Zheng; Brad M Keller; Shonket Ray; Yan Wang; Emily F Conant; James C Gee; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Automatic detection of the nipple in screen-film and full-field digital mammograms using a novel Hessian-based method.

Authors:  Paola Casti; Arianna Mencattini; Marcello Salmeri; Antonietta Ancona; Fabio Felice Mangieri; Maria Luisa Pepe; Rangaraj Mandayam Rangayyan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  The biology underlying molecular imaging in oncology: from genome to anatome and back again.

Authors:  R J Gillies; A R Anderson; R A Gatenby; D L Morse
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Andrew Oustimov; Brad M Keller; Lauren Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Mammographic quantitative image analysis and biologic image composition for breast lesion characterization and classification.

Authors:  Karen Drukker; Fred Duewer; Maryellen L Giger; Serghei Malkov; Chris I Flowers; Bonnie Joe; Karla Kerlikowske; Jennifer S Drukteinis; Hui Li; John A Shepherd
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.