Literature DB >> 8543645

Perinatal and infant postmortem examinations: how well are we doing?

G M Vujanić1, P H Cartlidge, J H Stewart, A J Dawson.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the quality of perinatal and infant necropsies and assess the relation between the quality and value of this investigation in different outcome groups.
METHODS: Cohort analysis of 540 deaths during 1993 of babies between 20 weeks' gestation and one year of age born to women usually resident in Wales. Cases were identified from the All Wales Perinatal Survey. Each case was assessed to establish whether the necropsy yielded clinically relevant information. The quality of necropsy was assessed by scoring aspects identified as being part of the necropsy.
RESULTS: Necropsy was performed in 335 (62%) cases, and the report was available for assessment in 314 cases. The quality of necropsy was below the minimum standard in 46% (143/314) of cases. The highest quality necropsies were carried out on fetal deaths at 20 to 23 weeks' gestation (12% (10/85) below standard), compared with 65% (87/133) below standard on stillbirths and 68% (21/31) on sudden unexpected infant death. Overall, 42% (131/314) of necropsies were performed in a regional paediatric pathology centre including 88% (76/88) of fetal deaths, 23% (31/133) of stillbirths and 30% (29/96) of infant deaths. The quality score for the necropsy performed in a regional centre failed to achieve the minimum acceptable score in 8% (11/131) of cases compared with 72% (132/182) for those done elsewhere. The cause of death was detected by necropsy in 17% (52/314) of cases. The quality of necropsy was significantly higher when the cause of death was revealed than when nothing new was found.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall quality of the perinatal and infant necropsy is poor. This is regrettable as valuable information can be revealed frequently by a good quality necropsy. Adherence to Guidelines for Postmortem Reports recently published by the Royal College of Pathologists should improve the situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8543645      PMCID: PMC503001          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.48.11.998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  14 in total

1.  Examination of fetuses after induced abortion for fetal abnormality.

Authors:  J Clayton-Smith; P A Farndon; C McKeown; D Donnai
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-03

2.  Quality assurance programme for necropsies.

Authors:  M Harrison; D O Hourihane
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Pediatric pathology and the autopsy.

Authors:  B E Favara; C Cottreau; L McIntyre; M Valdes-Dapena
Journal:  Pediatr Pathol       Date:  1989

4.  Value of perinatal necropsy examination.

Authors:  H J Porter; J W Keeling
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  A comprehensive quality assessment program on the autopsy service.

Authors:  A R Schned; R P Mogielnicki; M E Stauffer
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  The perinatal postmortem examination.

Authors:  F A Langley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Value and quality of perinatal and infant postmortem examinations: cohort analysis of 400 consecutive deaths.

Authors:  P H Cartlidge; A T Dawson; J H Stewart; G M Vujanic
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-21

8.  The value of the autopsy in three medical eras.

Authors:  L Goldman; R Sayson; S Robbins; L H Cohn; M Bettmann; M Weisberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-04-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  The perinatal autopsy: special considerations.

Authors:  D K Manchester; R H Shikes
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.190

10.  Perinatal autopsy: its clinical value.

Authors:  P R Meier; D K Manchester; R H Shikes; W H Clewell; M Stewart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  8 in total

1.  Improving the quality of perinatal and infant necropsy examinations: a follow up study.

Authors:  G M Vujanić; P H Cartlidge; J H Stewart
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Perinatal pathology in 2001.

Authors:  P Cox; R Scott
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Postmortem MR imaging of the fetal and stillborn central nervous system.

Authors:  Paul D Griffiths; Dick Variend; Margaret Evans; Angharad Jones; Iain D Wilkinson; Martyn N J Paley; Elspeth Whitby
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  An audit to assess the quality of necropsies performed on stillborn infants.

Authors:  H Burnley; I Moore
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Sudden death in children and adolescents.

Authors:  C Wren; J J O'Sullivan; C Wright
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Cross sectional survey of parents' experience and views of the postmortem examination.

Authors:  Judith Rankin; Chris Wright; Tom Lind
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

7.  The quality and value of sudden infant death necropsy reporting in Ireland.

Authors:  K M Sheehan; M McDonnell; E M Doyle; T Matthews; D M Devaney
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  The experimental design of postmortem studies: the effect size and statistical power.

Authors:  Joris Meurs
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.