Literature DB >> 10193328

Improving the quality of perinatal and infant necropsy examinations: a follow up study.

G M Vujanić1, P H Cartlidge, J H Stewart.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the quality of perinatal and infant necropsy examinations in 1996 with those performed in 1993.
METHODS: Cohort analysis, with data from the All Wales Perinatal Survey, of 1027 deaths (540 in 1993; 487 in 1996) of babies between 20 weeks' gestation and one year of age. The quality of the necropsy was assessed by scoring aspects identified as being part of the investigation.
RESULTS: Necropsy was performed in 335 cases (62%) in 1993 and in 320 cases (66%) in 1996. The proportion done in a regional centre increased significantly from 39% (131/335) in 1993 to 76% (243/320) in 1996 (p < 0.0001). The quality of necropsy was above the minimum standard in 54% of cases in 1993 (171/314) compared with 93% in 1996 (289/312) (p < 0.0001). Improvement occurred in all categories. For stillbirths, 35% (46/133) were above the minimum standard in 1993 compared with 90% (104/116) in 1996 (p < 0.0001); for cases not classified as sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI), the improvement was from 62% in 1993 (40/65) to 97% in 1996 (73/75) (p < 0.0001); and for SUDI cases, the improvement was from 32% in 1993 (10/31) to 91% in 1996 (21/23) (p < 0.0001). The quality of both non-regional and regional necropsies improved. For non-regional cases, the score was above the minimum standard in 28% (51/183) in 1993 compared with 69% (52/75) in 1996 (p < 0.0001); for regional cases it improved from 92% (120/131) in 1993 to 100% (237/237) in 1996 (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The quality of perinatal and infant necropsies improved considerably between 1993 and 1996, reflecting better awareness of the importance of good quality examination and an increase in referrals to paediatric centres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10193328      PMCID: PMC500981          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.51.11.850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  9 in total

1.  Antenatal ultrasound for fetal anomalies: importance of perinatal autopsy.

Authors:  S Shen-Schwarz; C Neish; L M Hill
Journal:  Pediatr Pathol       Date:  1989

2.  West Midlands perinatal mortality survey, 1987. An audit of 300 perinatal autopsies.

Authors:  D I Rushton
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-07

3.  A study of the quality of perinatal autopsy in the former northern region. The Northern Perinatal Mortality Survey Steering Group.

Authors:  C Wright; H Cameron; W Lamb
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1998-01

4.  A regional audit of perinatal and infant autopsies in Northern Ireland.

Authors:  C M Thornton; M D O'Hara
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1998-01

5.  Pediatric pathology and the autopsy.

Authors:  B E Favara; C Cottreau; L McIntyre; M Valdes-Dapena
Journal:  Pediatr Pathol       Date:  1989

6.  Value of perinatal necropsy examination.

Authors:  H J Porter; J W Keeling
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The ultimate audit.

Authors:  G Gau
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-06-18

8.  Value and quality of perinatal and infant postmortem examinations: cohort analysis of 400 consecutive deaths.

Authors:  P H Cartlidge; A T Dawson; J H Stewart; G M Vujanic
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-21

9.  Perinatal and infant postmortem examinations: how well are we doing?

Authors:  G M Vujanić; P H Cartlidge; J H Stewart; A J Dawson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Perinatal and infant autopsy.

Authors:  R Adappa; S Paranjothy; Z Roberts; P H T Cartlidge
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Histological examination has a major impact on macroscopic necropsy diagnoses.

Authors:  F D C Bernardi; P H N Saldiva; T Mauad
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Cross sectional survey of parents' experience and views of the postmortem examination.

Authors:  Judith Rankin; Chris Wright; Tom Lind
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

4.  The quality and value of sudden infant death necropsy reporting in Ireland.

Authors:  K M Sheehan; M McDonnell; E M Doyle; T Matthews; D M Devaney
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.