Literature DB >> 3818981

Value of perinatal necropsy examination.

H J Porter, J W Keeling.   

Abstract

In a retrospective study of 150 stillbirths and 150 neonatal deaths carried out between 1981 and 1985 the necropsy findings were compared with the clinical diagnoses, which had been obtained from the postmortem request form, and the case notes completed before the necropsy was performed. In all cases the necropsy comprised macroscopic findings and histological examination of all organs, with microbiology, radiology, and cytogenetics where appropriate. Clinically important differences between clinical and pathological diagnoses in 54 of 150 cases (36%) were noted in the cases of stillbirth. Of the neonatal deaths, examination showed clinically important information that had not been recognised during life in 66 cases (44%). Histological examination of tissues was essential for making or confirming the pathological diagnosis in 20% of all perinatal deaths.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3818981      PMCID: PMC1140864          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.40.2.180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  8 in total

1.  Diagnostic errors discovered at autopsy.

Authors:  M Britton
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1974-09

2.  Intrauterine growth retardation. Clinicopathologic findings in 233 consecutive infants.

Authors:  G Lugo; G Cassady
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1971-02-15       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  The ultimate audit.

Authors:  G Gau
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-06-18

4.  Evaluation of a protocol for post-mortem examination of stillbirths.

Authors:  R F Mueller; V P Sybert; J Johnson; Z A Brown; W J Chen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Autopsies in a modern teaching hospital. A review of 2,537 cases.

Authors:  H H Friederici; M Sebastian
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  The value of the autopsy in three medical eras.

Authors:  L Goldman; R Sayson; S Robbins; L H Cohn; M Bettmann; M Weisberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-04-28       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Clinical diagnosis: a post-mortem assessment of accuracy in the 1980s.

Authors:  J Mercer; I C Talbot
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  A prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies: I. Inaccuracies in death certification.

Authors:  H M Cameron; E McGoogan
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 7.996

  8 in total
  14 in total

1.  Improving the quality of perinatal and infant necropsy examinations: a follow up study.

Authors:  G M Vujanić; P H Cartlidge; J H Stewart
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Ten years of neonatal autopsies in tertiary referral centre: retrospective study.

Authors:  Malcolm Brodlie; Ian A Laing; Jean W Keeling; Kathryn J McKenzie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-30

3.  Perinatal pathology in 2001.

Authors:  P Cox; R Scott
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 4.  Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: a review of the literature.

Authors:  C Snowdon; D R Elbourne; J Garcia
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 5.  Diagnostic approach to stillbirths.

Authors:  L Mehta; I C Verma
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Ethical considerations of the perinatal necropsy.

Authors:  T Y Khong
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  A comparison between clinical diagnosis of death and autopsy diagnosis. A retrospective study of 131 newborns, stillborns and aborted fetuses.

Authors:  Mariana Costache; Monica Cirstoiu; Andreea Contolenco; Anca Mihaela Lazaroiu; Simion George; Maria Sajin; Oana Maria Patrascu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2014-06

8.  Changing patterns of infant death over the last 100 years: autopsy experience from a specialist children's hospital.

Authors:  J W Pryce; M A Weber; M T Ashworth; Sea Roberts; M Malone; N J Sebire
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  The quality and value of sudden infant death necropsy reporting in Ireland.

Authors:  K M Sheehan; M McDonnell; E M Doyle; T Matthews; D M Devaney
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Perinatal and infant postmortem examination. Survey of women's reactions to perinatal necropsy.

Authors:  H A Rahman; T Y Khong
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.