Literature DB >> 8543607

Errors in measurement of acetabular index.

N M Portinaro1, D W Murray, T P Bhullar, M K Benson.   

Abstract

Errors in determining the acetabular index can be induced either by incorrectly positioning the child for radiographs or by inter- or intraobserver errors. From postmortem radiographic studies, we have determined the magnitude of these errors. The error caused by pelvic rotation is +/- 3 degrees if the obturator foramina ratio is kept within 0.5 to 2. If pelvic flexion/extension is confined to +/- 10 degrees, the error induced by flexion/extension is +/- 3 degrees. The intraobserver error was +/- 2 degrees, and the interobserver error was +/- 3 degrees. Under these circumstances, the total error is +/- 5 degrees. We have not been able to find a satisfactory way of limiting the flexion/extension to +/- 10 degrees. In some circumstances, particularly if a child is distressed, the flexion/extension may be 20 degrees from neutral; under these circumstances, errors as large as 10 degrees can occur. Surgeons should be aware that very large errors can occur when the acetabular index is measured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8543607     DOI: 10.1097/01241398-199511000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  10 in total

1.  Pelvic incidence: an anatomic investigation of 880 cadaveric specimens.

Authors:  Douglas S Weinberg; William Z Morris; Jeremy J Gebhart; Raymond W Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Reliable angle assessment during periacetabular osteotomy with a novel device.

Authors:  Anders Troelsen; Brian Elmengaard; Lone Rømer; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Surveillance measures of the hips of children with bilateral cerebral palsy.

Authors:  D Scrutton; G Baird
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Pelvic rotation and tilt can cause misinterpretation of the acetabular index measured on radiographs.

Authors:  M J van der Bom; M E Groote; K L Vincken; F J Beek; L W Bartels
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Children treated for developmental dysplasia of the hip at birth and with normal acetabular index at 1 year: How many had residual dysplasia at 5 years?

Authors:  Øyvind Håberg; Thomas Bremnes; Olav A Foss; Oskar Angenete; Øystein B Lian; Ketil J Holen
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 1.917

6.  Weightbearing anteroposterior pelvic radiographs are recommended in DDH assessment.

Authors:  Anders Troelsen; Steffen Jacobsen; Lone Rømer; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Is ultrasound screening for DDH in babies born breech sufficient?

Authors:  Meghan Imrie; Vanessa Scott; Philip Stearns; Tracey Bastrom; Scott J Mubarak
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  Radiographic study of the acetabulum and proximal femur between 1 and 3 years of age.

Authors:  Pedro Gutiérrez Carbonell; D Bustamante Suárez de Puga; J Roca Vicente-Franqueira; A Lajarín Ortuño
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Evaluation of errors in measurements of infantile hip radiograph using digitally reconstructed radiograph from three-dimensional MRI.

Authors:  Daisuke Hamano; Kiyoshi Yoshida; Chikahisa Higuchi; Dai Otsuki; Hideki Yoshikawa; Kazuomi Sugamoto
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-05-09

10.  Correlation between ultrasonic and radiographic imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  A J Spaans; F J A Beek; C S P M Uiterwaal; J E H Pruijs; R J Sakkers
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.