Literature DB >> 19915881

Is ultrasound screening for DDH in babies born breech sufficient?

Meghan Imrie, Vanessa Scott, Philip Stearns, Tracey Bastrom, Scott J Mubarak.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review our incidence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in breech infants referred for ultrasound screening and to determine if subsequent follow-up radiographs are necessary in these patients with normal clinical and ultrasound examinations.
METHODS: A review of the clinical data and imaging studies of all children with the risk factor of breech presentation that were referred for orthopedic evaluation over a 5-year period was conducted. All patients were examined by a fellowship-trained pediatric orthopedic surgeon and all ultrasounds were done at approximately 6 weeks of age by an experienced ultrasonographer. Ultrasounds were evaluated using the dynamic method as described by Harcke. As per our protocol, all patients with normal screening ultrasounds were brought back for a final clinical examination and radiographic check at 4-6 months. Acetabular dysplasia was indicated by radiographic parameters-if there was severe blunting of the sourcil, abnormal acetabular index for age, or if there was significant asymmetry of acetabular indices side-to-side-in the setting of clinical parameters-if there was greater than 10° difference in side-to-side abduction or symmetric abduction of less than 60°.
RESULTS: Three hundred patients with the risk factor of breech presentation were included. Thirty-four patients had clinically unstable hips; 266 had clinically stable hips and were screened by ultrasound. Sixty-four percent were female and 36% were male. Twenty-seven percent of these breech patients had abnormal screening ultrasounds and were subsequently treated. Of the remaining 73% with normal ultrasounds, who were returned per protocol at a mean of 5 months, 29% had evidence of dysplasia and underwent treatment. The diagnosis of dysplasia following a normal ultrasound was based on both radiographic and clinical parameters. Of the hips treated with a Pavlik harness, 62% had acetabular indices at least two standard deviations from the age-corrected average versus 26% of patients not treated. The average length of follow-up was 10 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Retrospectively, we found that, at approximately 6 weeks of age, ultrasound screening of breech patients with clinically stable hips produces an incidence of DDH of 27%. In those patients with a normal ultrasound, 29%, at 4-6 months radiographic follow-up, were found to have dysplasia requiring treatment. This data supports breech as the most important risk factor for hip dysplasia and we, therefore, recommend careful and longitudinal evaluation of these patients with: a careful newborn physical examination, an ultrasound at age 6 weeks, and an anteroposterior (AP) pelvis and frog lateral radiograph at 6 months, as the risk of subsequent dysplasia is too high to discharge patients after a normal ultrasound.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19915881      PMCID: PMC2811678          DOI: 10.1007/s11832-009-0217-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Orthop        ISSN: 1863-2521            Impact factor:   1.548


  26 in total

1.  Risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip: ultrasonographic findings in the neonatal period.

Authors:  Christopher E Bache; John Clegg; Mark Herron
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Ultrasound screening in developmental hip dysplasia: do all scanned hips need to be followed up?

Authors:  Paul Jellicoe; Angus Aitken; Kenneth Wright
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Ultrasound and congenital dislocation of the hip. The importance of dynamic assessment.

Authors:  L B Engesaeter; D J Wilson; D Nag; M K Benson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-03

4.  Normal values of the hip joint for the evaluation of X-rays in children and adults.

Authors:  D Tönnis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Patterns of osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  L Solomon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1976-05

6.  Reliability of radiological measurements in the assessment of the child's hip.

Authors:  N S Broughton; D I Brougham; W G Cole; M B Menelaus
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-01

7.  Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Developmental hip dysplasia and dislocation: Part II.

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Scott J Mubarak; Dennis R Wenger
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2004

9.  Acetabular dysplasia in the adult.

Authors:  D R Cooperman; R Wallensten; S D Stulberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Real-time ultrasound in the diagnosis of congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  N M Clarke; H T Harcke; P McHugh; M S Lee; P F Borns; G D MacEwen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1985-05
View more
  15 in total

1.  Diagnosing developmental dysplasia of the hip using the Graf ultrasound method: risk and protective factor analysis in 11,820 universally screened newborns.

Authors:  Mohammad Schams; Rob Labruyère; Anne Zuse; Mikolaj Walensi
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Late recurrence of developmental dysplasia of the hip following Pavlik harness treatment until normal ultrasound appearance.

Authors:  Michael David; Curtis Robb; Sandeep Jawanda; Christopher Bache; Christopher Bradish
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2014-01-22

3.  A normal screening ultrasound does not provide complete reassurance in infants at risk of hip dysplasia; further follow-up is required.

Authors:  Jill Mulrain; Jennifer Hennebry; Patrick Dicker; James Condren; Donal O'Driscoll; Joseph O'Beirne
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Developmental dysplasia of the hip: What has changed in the last 20 years?

Authors:  Pavel Kotlarsky; Reuben Haber; Victor Bialik; Mark Eidelman
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

Review 5.  Hip dysplasia in the young adult caused by residual childhood and adolescent-onset dysplasia.

Authors:  Stephanie Pun
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

6.  Investigating the need for routine ultrasound screening to detect developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants born with breech presentation.

Authors:  Michelle D'Alessandro; Kimberly Dow
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Ultrasound Is an Alternative to X-ray for Diagnosing Developmental Dysplasia of the Hips in 6-Month-Old Children.

Authors:  Alison Kitay; Roger F Widmann; Shevaun M Doyle; Huong T Do; Daniel W Green
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-02-22

8.  DDH Epidemiology Revisited: Do We Need New Strategies?

Authors:  Amir R Vafaee; Taghi Baghdadi; Azarakhsh Baghdadi; Reza Khalili Jamnani
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-11

9.  Natural history of hip instability in infants (without subluxation or dislocation): a three year follow-up.

Authors:  Blazej Pruszczynski; H Theodore Harcke; Laurens Holmes; J Richard Bowen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Prenatal Screening for Developmental Displacement of the Hip: The BUDDHA (Pre-Birth Ultrasound for Developmental Displacement of the Hip Assessment) Study.

Authors:  Elena Contro; Laura Larcher; Jacopo Lenzi; Arianna Benfenati; Giulia Massinissa Magini; Giulia Galeati; Maria Terrone; Silvia Galletti; Santo Arcuri; Anna Seidenari; Antonio Farina
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.