Literature DB >> 19247569

Radiographic study of the acetabulum and proximal femur between 1 and 3 years of age.

Pedro Gutiérrez Carbonell1, D Bustamante Suárez de Puga, J Roca Vicente-Franqueira, A Lajarín Ortuño.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The angle formed by the intersection of the line between triradiate cartilage of both hips (Hilgenreiner's line) and a line drawn between triradiate cartilage and the external roof of the acetabulum is called the acetabular index (AI), the angle formed by line of proximal femoral physis and middiaphysis axis of femur is called the epiphyseal angle (EA). Both decrease with age, but it is not described whether there is a relation between them in this development. It would be very useful to compare its evolution in children with normal hips, in order to compare them with dysplasic hips in the same groups of age.
OBJECTIVE: To study the radiographic angles and the relationship between the acetabulum and the proximal femur.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study was performed on pelvic X-rays in 224 children between 1 and 3 years of age. Children with injuries, sepsis or inflammatory disease were excluded. We measured by goniometer (error +/-1 degrees ): the AI, and the angle of the proximal femoral physis (EA). We have compared statistically the parameters.
RESULTS: The AI was 21.1 degrees (+/-3.8), 19.9 degrees (+/-3.5), and 16.1 degrees (+/-4.2) and EA was 75.8 degrees (+/-5.1), 75.9 degrees (+/-6.3), and 75.6 degrees (+/-4.7), at the ages of 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. A significant difference was noted for AI between 2 and 3 years old (P = 0.003), but there was not significative EA decrease. No significant correlation was found between AI and EA among the different groups, nor overall (r = 0.03). Sex or side was not a significant factor for both angles.
CONCLUSION: The AI decreases significantly between 1 and 3 years of age, but not the EA. No significant relation was found between them in the different age groups. Normal children's hips have a tendency to spontaneously improve its acetabular morphology during the first 3 years of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19247569     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-009-0478-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  30 in total

1.  Reliability of radiological parameters measured on anteroposterior pelvis radiographs of patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  L Tan; S Aktas; C Copuroglu; M Ozcan; M Ture
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 0.500

2.  The reliability of measurements of pelvic radiographs in infants.

Authors:  F G Boniforti; G Fujii; R D Angliss; M K Benson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-07

Review 3.  Imaging in the surgical management of developmental dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  Leslie Grissom; H T Harcke; Mihir Thacker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Measurement of acetabular index intraobserver and interobserver variation.

Authors:  D K Spatz; M Reiger; M Klaumann; F Miller; R P Stanton; G E Lipton
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Timothy R Kuklo; Benjamin K Potter; Teresa M Schroeder; Michael F O'Brien
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The epiphyseal angle in coxa vara infantum and its relation to results.

Authors:  S Haraldsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1968

7.  Ultrasound screening for hips at risk in developmental dysplasia. Is it worth it?

Authors:  R W Paton; M S Srinivasan; B Shah; S Hollis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-03

8.  Errors in measurement of acetabular index.

Authors:  N M Portinaro; D W Murray; T P Bhullar; M K Benson
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

9.  Variability in measurement of acetabular index in normal and dysplastic hips, before and after reduction.

Authors:  D L Skaggs; C Kaminsky; V T Tolo; R M Kay; R A Reynolds
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  Radiographic parameters of the hip joint from birth to adolescence.

Authors:  Péter Than; Tamás Sillinger; János Kránicz; Arpád Bellyei
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-12-09
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip: ultrasound, radiography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christian A Barrera; Sara A Cohen; Wudbhav N Sankar; Victor M Ho-Fung; Raymond W Sze; Jie C Nguyen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-11-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.