Literature DB >> 18264742

Reliable angle assessment during periacetabular osteotomy with a novel device.

Anders Troelsen1, Brian Elmengaard, Lone Rømer, Kjeld Søballe.   

Abstract

We developed and assessed a measuring device for intraoperative assessment of the acetabular index and center edge angle during acetabular reorientation in periacetabular osteotomy. We asked whether reliable assessment of angles could be made using the device; to be reliable we presumed the variability of angle measurements should not exceed that of inherent variability when assessing angles on radiographs (+/- 5 degrees ). The device was mounted bilaterally on the pelvis, and using fluoroscopy, angle measurements were obtained with adjustable measuring discs. We conducted a cadaver study to assess intraobserver and interobserver variability of the device and to assess if pelvic positioning influenced variation of measurements. Intraoperative measurements of 35 consecutive patients were compared with measurements on postoperative radiographs. Intraoperatively obtained angle measurements differed less than +/- 5 degrees from measurements on postoperative radiographs and the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the device were confined within +/- 5 degrees . Positioning did not influence the variation of angle measurements beyond intraobserver variability of the device when applying arcs of tilt and rotation of +/- 12.5 degrees . We believe the device is a potentially helpful tool in the periacetabular osteotomy. It is simple to use and facilitates repeated reliable angle measurements during acetabular reorientation, making intraoperative radiographs unnecessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18264742      PMCID: PMC2311482          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0133-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  32 in total

Review 1.  Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Pelvic osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia.

Authors:  Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2003-04

3.  A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias. Technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  R Ganz; K Klaue; T S Vinh; J W Mast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Sources of error in the roentgen evaluation of the hip in infancy].

Authors:  F Ball; K Kommenda
Journal:  Ann Radiol (Paris)       Date:  1968

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Periacetabular osteotomy. Good pain relief in symptomatic hip dysplasia, 32 patients followed for 4 years.

Authors:  Francesco Pogliacomi; André Stark; Richard Wallensten
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Evaluation of acetabular dysplasia using a top view of the hip on three-dimensional CT.

Authors:  S Nakamura; J Yorikawa; K Otsuka; K Takeshita; A Harasawa; T Matsushita
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.601

8.  Changes in load-bearing area after Ganz periacetabular osteotomy evaluated by multislice CT scanning and stereology.

Authors:  Inger Mechlenburg; Jens R Nyengaard; Lone Rømer; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-04

9.  Recognizing acetabular version in the radiographic presentation of hip dysplasia.

Authors:  J W Mast; R L Brunner; J Zebrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Lessons learned after more than 250 periacetabular osteotomies.

Authors:  Robert T Trousdale; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2003-04
View more
  6 in total

1.  Report of breakout session: Defining parameters for correcting the acetabulum during a pelvic reorientation osteotomy.

Authors:  Michael B Millis; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Do Radiographic Parameters of Dysplasia Improve to Normal Ranges After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy?

Authors:  Eduardo N Novais; Stephen Duncan; Jeffrey Nepple; Gail Pashos; Perry L Schoenecker; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Computer assistance in hip preservation surgery-current status and introduction of our system.

Authors:  Klemen Stražar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  What factors predict failure 4 to 12 years after periacetabular osteotomy?

Authors:  Charlotte Hartig-Andreasen; Anders Troelsen; Theis Muncholm Thillemann; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Are changes in pain associated with changes in quality of life and hip function 2 years after periacetabular osteotomy? A follow-up study of 321 patients.

Authors:  Julie Boje; Christina Krogner Caspersen; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen; Kjeld Søballe; Inger Mechlenburg
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2019-03-14

6.  Three-dimensional acetabular orientation during periacetabular osteotomy: a video analysis of acetabular rim position using an external fixator as navigation tool during reorientation procedure.

Authors:  Timo J Schwarz; Günther Maderbacher; Franziska Leiss; Joachim Grifka; G Heers; J Matussek
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.067

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.