Literature DB >> 8543496

Safety profile of meropenem: international clinical experience based on the first 3125 patients treated with meropenem.

S R Norrby1, P A Newell, K L Faulkner, W Lesky.   

Abstract

Data from 3125 patients (3220 patient exposures) treated with meropenem were compared with those from 2886 patients (2960 patient exposures) treated with a variety of comparator agents including cephalosporins (alone or in combination with aminoglycosides or an anti-anaerobe agent) and imipenem/cilastatin. Patients treated included those with bacterial infections of the lower respiratory tract, urinary tract and skin and soft tissues, abdominal, obstetric and gynaecological infections, meningitis, febrile episodes in neutropenic patients and paediatric patients with infections. In three studies, meropenem was administered intramuscularly; in the remainder, meropenem was given by 15-30 min iv infusion or by bolus injection over approximately 5 min. The usual dosages were 500 mg or 1 g 8 hourly in adults and 10 or 20 mg/kg 8 hourly in children. In bacterial meningitis, the meropenem dosage in adults was 2 g 8 hourly and 40 mg/kg 8 hourly in children. The overall pattern and frequency of adverse events with meropenem were similar to those of the other beta-lactam antibiotics with which it was compared. The most frequently reported adverse events were diarrhoea, rash, nausea and vomiting, thrombocytosis, eosinophilia and changes in hepatic biochemistry. Abnormal laboratory tests occurred with similar frequencies between meropenem and the comparator agents. The safety profile of meropenem was similar in adults and children, and the presence of renal impairment did not alter the safety profile of meropenem. Experience in clinical studies in 3220 patient exposures has revealed no unusual or unexpected toxicity. The possibility of administration by either iv infusion or bolus injection with a low incidence of nausea and vomiting also provides flexibility in the clinical management of patients. Moreover, the low incidence of reported seizures and good tolerability at high doses, make meropenem particularly useful for the treatment of meningitis and other indications which carry a risk of seizures, or in the treatment of serious infections where high doses of antibiotics are frequently indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8543496     DOI: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  22 in total

1.  High-intensity meropenem combinations with polymyxin B: new strategies to overcome carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Justin R Lenhard; Jürgen B Bulitta; Terry D Connell; Natalie King-Lyons; Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Soon-Ee Cheah; Visanu Thamlikitkul; Beom Soo Shin; Gauri Rao; Patricia N Holden; Thomas J Walsh; Alan Forrest; Roger L Nation; Jian Li; Brian T Tsuji
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of meropenem after intravenous administration by injection over 2, 3 and 5 minutes.

Authors:  H K Jones; H C Kelly; M Hutchison; R A Yates; F Ross; C Lomax; S Freestone; D Webb
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.441

3.  Meropenem-clavulanic acid has high in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  L Davies Forsman; C G Giske; J Bruchfeld; T Schön; P Juréen; K Ängeby
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Meropenem versus cefuroxime plus gentamicin for treatment of serious infections in elderly patients.

Authors:  C A Jaspers; H Kieft; B Speelberg; A Buiting; M van Marwijk Kooij; G J Ruys; H H Vincent; M C Vermeulen; A G Olink; I M Hoepelman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Carbapenems in serious infections: a risk-benefit assessment.

Authors:  S R Norrby
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Imipenem and meropenem: Comparison of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials and adverse effects.

Authors:  G G Zhanel; A E Simor; L Vercaigne; L Mandell
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1998-07

Review 7.  Antibacterial dosing in intensive care: pharmacokinetics, degree of disease and pharmacodynamics of sepsis.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Comparative review of the carbapenems.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Ryan Wiebe; Leanne Dilay; Kristjan Thomson; Ethan Rubinstein; Daryl J Hoban; Ayman M Noreddin; James A Karlowsky
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Disposition and elimination of meropenem in cerebrospinal fluid of hydrocephalic patients with external ventriculostomy.

Authors:  R Nau; C Lassek; M Kinzig-Schippers; A Thiel; H W Prange; F Sörgel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Outcome evaluation of an intervention to improve the effective and safe use of meropenem.

Authors:  Yusuke Yagi; Masafumi Okazaki; Hiromi Higaki; Megumi Nakai; Ayumu Hirata; Mitsuhiko Miyamura
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.