Literature DB >> 24748508

Outcome evaluation of an intervention to improve the effective and safe use of meropenem.

Yusuke Yagi1, Masafumi Okazaki, Hiromi Higaki, Megumi Nakai, Ayumu Hirata, Mitsuhiko Miyamura.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists have been involved in promoting the proper and safe use of antimicrobial drugs in our institution since 2010. Setting Kochi Medical School Hospital, Japan.
OBJECTIVE: To design and evaluate a plan of administration of meropenem (MEPM) based on its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, drug sensitivity, bacterial cultures, patient condition and renal function.
METHOD: A total of 547 patients admitted between April 2010 and March 2013 with serious infections who were successfully treated with MEPM for three or more days were analysed. Patients were initially divided into two groups according to renal function: group A consisted of patients with mild renal dysfunction [creatinine clearance (CLcr) > 50 mL/min] while group B consisted of patients with moderate to severe renal dysfunction (CLcr ≤ 50 mL/min). These groups were then subdivided into two groups according to the implementation of pharmacist intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Daily dose, frequency of administration, dose interval, duration of therapy, adverse events and cost reduction.
RESULTS: In the non-intervention subgroup within group A, the daily dose was 1,000 mg/day, the frequency of administration was 1.8 ± 0.6 times/day, and the duration of therapy was 9.4 ± 5.4 days. In the intervention subgroup within group A, the daily dose was 1,500 mg/day, the administration frequency was 2.5 ± 0.6 times/day, and the duration of therapy was 7.4 ± 3.7 days. Although the dose was higher (P < 0.05) and the duration of therapy was an average of 2 days shorter (P < 0.05) in the intervention subgroup, there was no significant difference in the rate of adverse events between the two subgroups. In group B, there were no significant differences between the two subgroups in the daily dose, administration frequency, or duration of therapy. However, liver dysfunction was significantly more common in the non-intervention subgroup than in the intervention subgroup (P < 0.05). The total reduction in drug cost in the intervention groups was estimated to be US$17,490 over 3 years.
CONCLUSION: Pharmacist intervention was associated with a shorter duration of therapy, lower drug costs, and decreased adverse effect. We believe that our intervention is beneficial in terms of effectiveness and safety, and supports proper antimicrobial use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24748508     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-014-9949-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  17 in total

1.  Can PK/PD be used in everyday clinical practice.

Authors:  Francesco Scaglione
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.283

2.  Prevention of resistance: a goal for dose selection for antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  G L Drusano
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Multicenter in vitro evaluation of SM-7338, a new carbapenem.

Authors:  R N Jones; K E Aldridge; S D Allen; A L Barry; P C Fuchs; E H Gerlach; M A Pfaller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  A proposal of the diagnostic scale of drug-induced liver injury.

Authors:  Hajime Takikawa; Morikazu Onji
Journal:  Hepatol Res       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 4.288

5.  Comparative in vitro activity of SM7338, a new carbapenem antimicrobial agent.

Authors:  D E Sentochnik; G M Eliopoulos; M J Ferraro; R C Moellering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  A comparative study on the convulsant activity of carbapenems and beta-lactams.

Authors:  J Shimada; S Hori; K Kanemitsu; Y Shoji; S Nakashio; A Yanagawa
Journal:  Drugs Exp Clin Res       Date:  1992

7.  Factors predisposing to seizures in seriously ill infected patients receiving antibiotics: experience with imipenem/cilastatin.

Authors:  G Calandra; E Lydick; J Carrigan; L Weiss; H Guess
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Pharmacokinetics of meropenem (ICI 194,660) and its metabolite (ICI 213,689) in healthy subjects and in patients with renal impairment.

Authors:  A Leroy; J P Fillastre; F Borsa-Lebas; I Etienne; G Humbert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Safety profile of meropenem: an updated review of over 6,000 patients treated with meropenem.

Authors:  Peter Linden
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Ravindra L Mehta; John A Kellum; Sudhir V Shah; Bruce A Molitoris; Claudio Ronco; David G Warnock; Adeera Levin
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Evidence of clinical and economic impact of pharmacist interventions related to antimicrobials in the hospital setting.

Authors:  L Leache; I Aquerreta; A Aldaz; A Idoate; A Ortega
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.267

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.