Literature DB >> 8510943

Reliability of high- and low-contrast letter charts.

B C Reeves1, J M Wood, A R Hill.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to measure the reliability, in test score units, of several clinical tests which use high- and low-contrast letters, and to provide an estimate of what constitutes a significant change in performance over time. Patients with normal vision and with early or subtle eye disease were recruited so that the results would be representative of the population likely to present for primary vision screening. Patients were tested on the Bailey-Lovie logMAR chart, the Regan low-contrast letter charts and the Pelli-Robson low-contrast letter chart on two occasions; the two test sessions were separated by at least four weeks to give an estimate of reliability appropriate for the conditions under which the tests are likely to be used. A 'significant change', i.e. one which would be observed in only about 5% of patients with stable visual performance, was about +/- 2 'steps' of the measurement scale, i.e. +/- 2 lines for the Bailey-Lovie and Regan charts and +/- 2 letter groups for the Pelli-Robson chart.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8510943     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1993.tb00421.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  14 in total

1.  [Frankfurt-Freiburg Contrast and Acuity Test System (FF-CATS). A new test to determine contrast sensitivity under variable ambient and glare luminance levels].

Authors:  E Terzi; J Bühren; W Wesemann; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Assessing the role of different spatial frequencies in word perception by good and poor readers.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Patching; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

3.  On the precision and reliability of IOP measurements.

Authors:  J M Gilchrist
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Repeatability of mesopic visual acuity measurements using high- and low-contrast ETDRS letter charts.

Authors:  Ana Barrio; Beatriz Antona; María C Puell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  A vision specific functional index for use in patients with age related macular degeneration.

Authors:  P M Hart; U Chakravarthy; M R Stevenson; J Q Jamison
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Measuring visual acuity in general practice. May not be reliable.

Authors:  M J Moseley; H S Jones; P I Murray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-03-11

7.  Repeatability of Monocular Acuity Testing in Adults with and without Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Julia S Benoit; Kelsie B Morrison; Jason D Marsack; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Learning effect of dark adaptation among normal subjects.

Authors:  John Christoforidis; Xiaoli Zhang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Validation of printed and computerised crowded Kay picture logMAR tests against gold standard ETDRS acuity test chart measurements in adult and amblyopic paediatric subjects.

Authors:  N Shah; D A H Laidlaw; S Rashid; P Hysi
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Do patients with age related maculopathy and cataract benefit from cataract surgery?

Authors:  G N Shuttleworth; E A Luhishi; R A Harrad
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.