Literature DB >> 8509754

An evaluation of 4% prilocaine and 3% mepivacaine compared with 2% lidocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) for inferior alveolar nerve block.

C McLean1, A Reader, M Beck, W J Meryers.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure the degree of anesthesia obtained with 4% prilocaine and 3% mepivacaine compared with 2% lidocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) for inferior alveolar nerve block. Using a repeated measures design, 30 subjects randomly received an inferior alveolar injection using masked cartridges of each solution at three successive appointments. The first molar, first premolar, lateral incisor, and contralateral canine (control) were blindly tested with an Analytic Technology pulp tester at 3-min cycles for 50 min. Anesthetic success was defined as no subject response to the maximum output of the pulp tester (80 reading) within 16 min and maintenance of this reading for 50 min. Although subjects felt numb subjectively, anesthetic success as defined here occurred in 43 to 63% of the molars, in 53 to 67% of the premolars, and in 30 to 37% of the lateral incisors. No statistically significant differences in onset, success, or failure were found among the solutions. We conclude that the three preparations are equivalent for an inferior alveolar nerve block of 50-min duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8509754     DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)80510-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  21 in total

1.  Anesthetic efficacy of a repeated intraosseous injection given 30 min following an inferior alveolar nerve block/intraosseous injection.

Authors:  J Reitz; A Reader; R Nist; M Beck; W J Meyers
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1998

2.  Anesthetic efficacy of infiltrations in mandibular anterior teeth.

Authors:  T Yonchak; A Reader; M Beck; K Clark; W J Meyers
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2001

3.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4% prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 4% prilocaine for maxillary infiltrations.

Authors:  Steven Katz; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2010

Review 4.  Effective anaesthesia of the acutely inflamed pulp: part 1. The acutely inflamed pulp.

Authors:  S S Virdee; D Seymour; S Bhakta
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Anesthetic efficacy of buccal and lingual infiltrations of lidocaine following an inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular posterior teeth.

Authors:  William Foster; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2007

6.  Anesthetic efficacy of 3 volumes of lidocaine with epinephrine in maxillary infiltration anesthesia.

Authors:  Paula Cristina Brunetto; José Ranali; Gláucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano; Patrícia Cristine de Oliveira; Francisco Carlos Groppo; John Gerard Meechan; Maria Cristina Volpato
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2008

7.  Periodontal intraligament injection as alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block--meta-analysis of the literature from 1979 to 2012.

Authors:  N Shabazfar; M Daubländer; B Al-Nawas; P W Kämmerer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Anesthetic efficacy of lidocaine/meperidine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks.

Authors:  Amanda Goodman; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck; Joel Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2006

9.  Summary of the scientific literature for pain and anxiety control in dentistry.

Authors:  L C Hassett
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1994

10.  Anesthetic efficacy of an infiltration in mandibular anterior teeth following an inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  Kenneth Clark; Al Reader; Mike Beck; William J Meyers
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2002
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.